Performance comparison of different multicast routing strategies in disruption tolerant networks
Disruption Tolerant Networks (DTNs) technologies are emerging solutions to networks that experience frequent partitions. As a result, multicast design in DTNs is a considerably more difficult problem compared to that in Internet and mobile ad hoc networks. In this paper, we first investigate three b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Computer communications 2009-10, Vol.32 (16), p.1731-1741 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Disruption Tolerant Networks (DTNs) technologies are emerging solutions to networks that experience frequent partitions. As a result, multicast design in DTNs is a considerably more difficult problem compared to that in Internet and mobile ad hoc networks. In this paper, we first investigate three basic DTN multicast strategies, including unicast-based multicast (U-Multicast), static-tree-based multicast (ST-Multicast) and dynamic-tree-based multicast (DT-Multicast) strategies. Then we focus on studying two DT-Multicast routing schemes: Dynamic Tree Based Routing (DTBR) and On-demand Situation-aware Multicast (OS-Multicast), which address the challenges of utilizing opportunistic links to conduct dynamic multicast structures in DTNs. Performances of different strategies are then evaluated by simulations, including applying the real-world DTN traces. Our results show that OS-Multicast and DTBR can achieve higher message delivery ratio than that of using U-Multicast and ST-Multicast strategies. Also, to get better performance, we recommend that system designers select OS-Multicast when the source traffic rate is low. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0140-3664 1873-703X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.comcom.2009.02.007 |