Molecular dynamics calculation of thermal expansion coefficient of a series of rare-earth zirconates
To develop more reliable and stable thermal barrier coatings, low thermal conductivity materials with higher thermal expansion coefficients (TECs), like rare-earth zirconates (A 2Zr 2O 7, A = La, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Er, Yb and Lu), have been the focus of a great deal of attention in recent years. But th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Computational materials science 2009-09, Vol.46 (3), p.716-719 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To develop more reliable and stable thermal barrier coatings, low thermal conductivity materials with higher thermal expansion coefficients (TECs), like rare-earth zirconates (A
2Zr
2O
7, A
=
La, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Er, Yb and Lu), have been the focus of a great deal of attention in recent years. But the mechanisms underlying the values of TECs are still poorly understood. In this paper, the TECs of a series of rare-earth zirconates are calculated using molecular dynamics. Two typical crystal structures, pyrochlore and fluorite, are considered. By investigating the potential functions and the equilibrium-location deviations between the atoms, it is found that the Zr–O bond is the most important factor that determines the overall TECs, and the A–O bond plays a secondary role. However, O–O has little effect on the TECs. In addition, the fluorite structure has a relatively higher TEC due to a weaker Zr–O bond. Calculated values are consistent with the experimental observations. Using the method presented in this study, two doped zirconates (Gd
0.4Sm
0.5Yb
0.1)
2Zr
2O
7 and Sm
2(Ce
0.3Zr
0.7)
2O
7 are designed and compared. As expected, both of them have higher TECs than undoped Sm
2Zr
2O
7, and doping at the A-site is more efficient than doping at the Zr-site. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0927-0256 1879-0801 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.02.033 |