On the tetragonality of the room-temperature ferroelectric phase of barium titanate, BaTiO3

The room‐temperature phase of the important ferroelectric material barium titanate, BaTiO3, was re‐investigated by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction on a sample grown by the top‐seeded solution growth method, with the intention of demonstrating once again that the structure has tetragonal symmetry co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied crystallography 2009-06, Vol.42 (3), p.480-484
Hauptverfasser: Keeble, Dean S., Thomas, Pamela A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The room‐temperature phase of the important ferroelectric material barium titanate, BaTiO3, was re‐investigated by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction on a sample grown by the top‐seeded solution growth method, with the intention of demonstrating once again that the structure has tetragonal symmetry consistent with the space‐group assignment P4mm and thus resolving recent controversy in the scientific community and literature [Yoshimura, Kojima, Tokunaga, Tozaki & Koganezawa (2006). Phys. Lett. A, 353, 250–254; Yoshimura, Morioka, Kojima, Tokunaga, Koganezawa & Tozaki (2007). Phys. Lett. A, 367, 394–401]. To this end, the X‐ray diffraction pattern of a small (341 µm3) sample of top‐seeded solution‐grown BaTiO3 was measured using an Oxford Diffraction Gemini CCD diffractometer employing Mo Kα radiation and an extended 120 mm sample‐to‐detector distance. More than 104 individual diffraction maxima observed out to a maximum resolution of 0.4 Å were indexed on two tetragonal lattices. These were identical to within the standard deviations on the lattice parameters and were related to each other by a single rotation of 119.7° about the [11] direction of the first tetragonal lattice (the major twin component), although the actual twinning operation that explains the observed diffraction pattern both qualitatively and quantitatively is shown to be conventional 90° twinning by the m[101] operation. Importantly, it is not necessary to invoke either monoclinic symmetry or a coexistence of tetragonal and monoclinic phases to explain the observed diffraction data.
ISSN:1600-5767
0021-8898
1600-5767
DOI:10.1107/S0021889809008310