Traffic-generated airborne particles in naturally ventilated multi-storey residential buildings of Singapore: Vertical distribution and potential health risks

The main objective of the study is to quantify the mass concentration exposure levels of fine traffic-generated particles (PM 2.5) at various heights of typical multi-storey public housing buildings located in close proximity, i.e. within 30 m and along a busy major expressway in Singapore. The seco...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Building and environment 2009-07, Vol.44 (7), p.1493-1500
Hauptverfasser: Kalaiarasan, M., Balasubramanian, R., Cheong, K.W.D., Tham, K.W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1500
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1493
container_title Building and environment
container_volume 44
creator Kalaiarasan, M.
Balasubramanian, R.
Cheong, K.W.D.
Tham, K.W.
description The main objective of the study is to quantify the mass concentration exposure levels of fine traffic-generated particles (PM 2.5) at various heights of typical multi-storey public housing buildings located in close proximity, i.e. within 30 m and along a busy major expressway in Singapore. The secondary objective is to compare the potential health risks of occupants in the buildings, associated with inhalation exposure of fine traffic-generated particulate matter, based on estimated dose rates and the lowest observed adverse effect levels (loael) at the various floors of these buildings. Two typical public housing buildings, both naturally ventilated residential apartment blocks, of point block configuration (22-storey) and slab block configuration (16-storey) were selected for the study. Particulate samples were collected for both mass and chemical analysis (OC/EC ratio) at three representative floors: the lower, the mid, and upper floors of the buildings. Key meteorological parameters such as wind speed, wind direction, ambient temperature, and relative humidity were also concurrently measured at the sampling locations. For the potential health risk analysis, the occupants have been divided into four age categories namely, infants, children (1 year), children (8–10 years) and adults. The analysis takes into account age-specific breathing rates, body weights for different age categories. Experimental results explicitly showed that PM 2.5 mean particle mass concentration was highest at the midfloors of both buildings when compared to those measured at upper and lower floors during a typical day. Although the lower floors were closest to traffic emissions, the mean particle mass concentration was lower there than that at the midfloors, which could presumably be due to the interception of PM 2.5 particles by tree leaves or the inflow of clean and drier air from higher altitude with lower aerosol burden mixing with the traffic-polluted air at the lower levels thus lowering the concentration at the lower floors similar to induced chimney effect or both. The upper floors had the least fine particulate matter mass concentration due to dilution following pronounced mixing of traffic-polluted air with ambient air. The only difference between both blocks is that at corresponding floors, the mass concentration levels for slab block is much higher than that of point block. This could be attributed to the configuration of the blocks. Observational data show the slab
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.07.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_33925556</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360132308001911</els_id><sourcerecordid>33925556</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f2c05d5ed1b33a26956e66fee99456dcf2776724e4a3e5892277bb0e10eeb7293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQxi0EEkvhFZAvcEvwn8RJOIGqApUqcaAgbpZjT9pZvE6wnZX2ZXhWvN0tV04ey79vvvF8hLzmrOaMq3fbelzROwj7WjDW16yrGRdPyIb3naxU3_x8SjZMKlZxKeRz8iKlLSvCQTYb8uc2mmlCW91BgGgyOGowjnMMQBcTM1oPiWKgweQ1Gu8PdA8ho39Ad6vPWKU8RzjQCAnd8c14-jARhrtE54l-K4VZCvOe_oBjywI4TDniuGacAzXB0WXOZ-09GJ_vacT0K70kzybjE7w6nxfk-6er28sv1c3Xz9eXH28qKzuZq0lY1roWHB-lNEINrQKlJoBhaFrl7CS6TnWigcZIaPtBlPs4MuAMYOzEIC_I21PfJc6_V0hZ7zBZ8N4EmNekpRxE27aqgOoE2jinFGHSS8SdiQfNmT7Gobf6MQ59jEOzTpc4ivDN2cGksoApmmAx_VML3jDZs75wH04clO_uEaJOFiFYcBjBZu1m_J_VXzdYqY0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>33925556</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Traffic-generated airborne particles in naturally ventilated multi-storey residential buildings of Singapore: Vertical distribution and potential health risks</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Kalaiarasan, M. ; Balasubramanian, R. ; Cheong, K.W.D. ; Tham, K.W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kalaiarasan, M. ; Balasubramanian, R. ; Cheong, K.W.D. ; Tham, K.W.</creatorcontrib><description>The main objective of the study is to quantify the mass concentration exposure levels of fine traffic-generated particles (PM 2.5) at various heights of typical multi-storey public housing buildings located in close proximity, i.e. within 30 m and along a busy major expressway in Singapore. The secondary objective is to compare the potential health risks of occupants in the buildings, associated with inhalation exposure of fine traffic-generated particulate matter, based on estimated dose rates and the lowest observed adverse effect levels (loael) at the various floors of these buildings. Two typical public housing buildings, both naturally ventilated residential apartment blocks, of point block configuration (22-storey) and slab block configuration (16-storey) were selected for the study. Particulate samples were collected for both mass and chemical analysis (OC/EC ratio) at three representative floors: the lower, the mid, and upper floors of the buildings. Key meteorological parameters such as wind speed, wind direction, ambient temperature, and relative humidity were also concurrently measured at the sampling locations. For the potential health risk analysis, the occupants have been divided into four age categories namely, infants, children (1 year), children (8–10 years) and adults. The analysis takes into account age-specific breathing rates, body weights for different age categories. Experimental results explicitly showed that PM 2.5 mean particle mass concentration was highest at the midfloors of both buildings when compared to those measured at upper and lower floors during a typical day. Although the lower floors were closest to traffic emissions, the mean particle mass concentration was lower there than that at the midfloors, which could presumably be due to the interception of PM 2.5 particles by tree leaves or the inflow of clean and drier air from higher altitude with lower aerosol burden mixing with the traffic-polluted air at the lower levels thus lowering the concentration at the lower floors similar to induced chimney effect or both. The upper floors had the least fine particulate matter mass concentration due to dilution following pronounced mixing of traffic-polluted air with ambient air. The only difference between both blocks is that at corresponding floors, the mass concentration levels for slab block is much higher than that of point block. This could be attributed to the configuration of the blocks. Observational data show the slab block tends to slow down the approaching wind thus allowing the accumulation of the fine traffic-generated particulate matter in front of the building. For point block, the HR values at the mid and lower floors suggest that occupants living in these floors experience 1.81 and 1.34 times more health risk, respectively, in contracting respiratory diseases when compared to those living at the upper floors for all age categories. Similarly, for the slab block, occupants living in the mid and lower floors had 1.62 and 1.28 times more risk, respectively, in contracting respiratory diseases when compared to those living at the upper floors for all age categories.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-1323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-684X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.07.012</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BUENDB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Building technical equipments ; Buildings ; Buildings. Public works ; Dose-response ; Environmental engineering ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fine particulate matter ; Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction ; Health risks ; Road transportation and traffic ; Ventilation. Air conditioning ; Vertical distribution profile</subject><ispartof>Building and environment, 2009-07, Vol.44 (7), p.1493-1500</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f2c05d5ed1b33a26956e66fee99456dcf2776724e4a3e5892277bb0e10eeb7293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f2c05d5ed1b33a26956e66fee99456dcf2776724e4a3e5892277bb0e10eeb7293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.07.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21403808$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kalaiarasan, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balasubramanian, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheong, K.W.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tham, K.W.</creatorcontrib><title>Traffic-generated airborne particles in naturally ventilated multi-storey residential buildings of Singapore: Vertical distribution and potential health risks</title><title>Building and environment</title><description>The main objective of the study is to quantify the mass concentration exposure levels of fine traffic-generated particles (PM 2.5) at various heights of typical multi-storey public housing buildings located in close proximity, i.e. within 30 m and along a busy major expressway in Singapore. The secondary objective is to compare the potential health risks of occupants in the buildings, associated with inhalation exposure of fine traffic-generated particulate matter, based on estimated dose rates and the lowest observed adverse effect levels (loael) at the various floors of these buildings. Two typical public housing buildings, both naturally ventilated residential apartment blocks, of point block configuration (22-storey) and slab block configuration (16-storey) were selected for the study. Particulate samples were collected for both mass and chemical analysis (OC/EC ratio) at three representative floors: the lower, the mid, and upper floors of the buildings. Key meteorological parameters such as wind speed, wind direction, ambient temperature, and relative humidity were also concurrently measured at the sampling locations. For the potential health risk analysis, the occupants have been divided into four age categories namely, infants, children (1 year), children (8–10 years) and adults. The analysis takes into account age-specific breathing rates, body weights for different age categories. Experimental results explicitly showed that PM 2.5 mean particle mass concentration was highest at the midfloors of both buildings when compared to those measured at upper and lower floors during a typical day. Although the lower floors were closest to traffic emissions, the mean particle mass concentration was lower there than that at the midfloors, which could presumably be due to the interception of PM 2.5 particles by tree leaves or the inflow of clean and drier air from higher altitude with lower aerosol burden mixing with the traffic-polluted air at the lower levels thus lowering the concentration at the lower floors similar to induced chimney effect or both. The upper floors had the least fine particulate matter mass concentration due to dilution following pronounced mixing of traffic-polluted air with ambient air. The only difference between both blocks is that at corresponding floors, the mass concentration levels for slab block is much higher than that of point block. This could be attributed to the configuration of the blocks. Observational data show the slab block tends to slow down the approaching wind thus allowing the accumulation of the fine traffic-generated particulate matter in front of the building. For point block, the HR values at the mid and lower floors suggest that occupants living in these floors experience 1.81 and 1.34 times more health risk, respectively, in contracting respiratory diseases when compared to those living at the upper floors for all age categories. Similarly, for the slab block, occupants living in the mid and lower floors had 1.62 and 1.28 times more risk, respectively, in contracting respiratory diseases when compared to those living at the upper floors for all age categories.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Building technical equipments</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Dose-response</subject><subject>Environmental engineering</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fine particulate matter</subject><subject>Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Road transportation and traffic</subject><subject>Ventilation. Air conditioning</subject><subject>Vertical distribution profile</subject><issn>0360-1323</issn><issn>1873-684X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQxi0EEkvhFZAvcEvwn8RJOIGqApUqcaAgbpZjT9pZvE6wnZX2ZXhWvN0tV04ey79vvvF8hLzmrOaMq3fbelzROwj7WjDW16yrGRdPyIb3naxU3_x8SjZMKlZxKeRz8iKlLSvCQTYb8uc2mmlCW91BgGgyOGowjnMMQBcTM1oPiWKgweQ1Gu8PdA8ho39Ad6vPWKU8RzjQCAnd8c14-jARhrtE54l-K4VZCvOe_oBjywI4TDniuGacAzXB0WXOZ-09GJ_vacT0K70kzybjE7w6nxfk-6er28sv1c3Xz9eXH28qKzuZq0lY1roWHB-lNEINrQKlJoBhaFrl7CS6TnWigcZIaPtBlPs4MuAMYOzEIC_I21PfJc6_V0hZ7zBZ8N4EmNekpRxE27aqgOoE2jinFGHSS8SdiQfNmT7Gobf6MQ59jEOzTpc4ivDN2cGksoApmmAx_VML3jDZs75wH04clO_uEaJOFiFYcBjBZu1m_J_VXzdYqY0</recordid><startdate>20090701</startdate><enddate>20090701</enddate><creator>Kalaiarasan, M.</creator><creator>Balasubramanian, R.</creator><creator>Cheong, K.W.D.</creator><creator>Tham, K.W.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090701</creationdate><title>Traffic-generated airborne particles in naturally ventilated multi-storey residential buildings of Singapore: Vertical distribution and potential health risks</title><author>Kalaiarasan, M. ; Balasubramanian, R. ; Cheong, K.W.D. ; Tham, K.W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f2c05d5ed1b33a26956e66fee99456dcf2776724e4a3e5892277bb0e10eeb7293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Building technical equipments</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Dose-response</topic><topic>Environmental engineering</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fine particulate matter</topic><topic>Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Road transportation and traffic</topic><topic>Ventilation. Air conditioning</topic><topic>Vertical distribution profile</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kalaiarasan, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balasubramanian, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheong, K.W.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tham, K.W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kalaiarasan, M.</au><au>Balasubramanian, R.</au><au>Cheong, K.W.D.</au><au>Tham, K.W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Traffic-generated airborne particles in naturally ventilated multi-storey residential buildings of Singapore: Vertical distribution and potential health risks</atitle><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle><date>2009-07-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1493</spage><epage>1500</epage><pages>1493-1500</pages><issn>0360-1323</issn><eissn>1873-684X</eissn><coden>BUENDB</coden><abstract>The main objective of the study is to quantify the mass concentration exposure levels of fine traffic-generated particles (PM 2.5) at various heights of typical multi-storey public housing buildings located in close proximity, i.e. within 30 m and along a busy major expressway in Singapore. The secondary objective is to compare the potential health risks of occupants in the buildings, associated with inhalation exposure of fine traffic-generated particulate matter, based on estimated dose rates and the lowest observed adverse effect levels (loael) at the various floors of these buildings. Two typical public housing buildings, both naturally ventilated residential apartment blocks, of point block configuration (22-storey) and slab block configuration (16-storey) were selected for the study. Particulate samples were collected for both mass and chemical analysis (OC/EC ratio) at three representative floors: the lower, the mid, and upper floors of the buildings. Key meteorological parameters such as wind speed, wind direction, ambient temperature, and relative humidity were also concurrently measured at the sampling locations. For the potential health risk analysis, the occupants have been divided into four age categories namely, infants, children (1 year), children (8–10 years) and adults. The analysis takes into account age-specific breathing rates, body weights for different age categories. Experimental results explicitly showed that PM 2.5 mean particle mass concentration was highest at the midfloors of both buildings when compared to those measured at upper and lower floors during a typical day. Although the lower floors were closest to traffic emissions, the mean particle mass concentration was lower there than that at the midfloors, which could presumably be due to the interception of PM 2.5 particles by tree leaves or the inflow of clean and drier air from higher altitude with lower aerosol burden mixing with the traffic-polluted air at the lower levels thus lowering the concentration at the lower floors similar to induced chimney effect or both. The upper floors had the least fine particulate matter mass concentration due to dilution following pronounced mixing of traffic-polluted air with ambient air. The only difference between both blocks is that at corresponding floors, the mass concentration levels for slab block is much higher than that of point block. This could be attributed to the configuration of the blocks. Observational data show the slab block tends to slow down the approaching wind thus allowing the accumulation of the fine traffic-generated particulate matter in front of the building. For point block, the HR values at the mid and lower floors suggest that occupants living in these floors experience 1.81 and 1.34 times more health risk, respectively, in contracting respiratory diseases when compared to those living at the upper floors for all age categories. Similarly, for the slab block, occupants living in the mid and lower floors had 1.62 and 1.28 times more risk, respectively, in contracting respiratory diseases when compared to those living at the upper floors for all age categories.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.07.012</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-1323
ispartof Building and environment, 2009-07, Vol.44 (7), p.1493-1500
issn 0360-1323
1873-684X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_33925556
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Applied sciences
Building technical equipments
Buildings
Buildings. Public works
Dose-response
Environmental engineering
Exact sciences and technology
Fine particulate matter
Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction
Health risks
Road transportation and traffic
Ventilation. Air conditioning
Vertical distribution profile
title Traffic-generated airborne particles in naturally ventilated multi-storey residential buildings of Singapore: Vertical distribution and potential health risks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A28%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Traffic-generated%20airborne%20particles%20in%20naturally%20ventilated%20multi-storey%20residential%20buildings%20of%20Singapore:%20Vertical%20distribution%20and%20potential%20health%20risks&rft.jtitle=Building%20and%20environment&rft.au=Kalaiarasan,%20M.&rft.date=2009-07-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1493&rft.epage=1500&rft.pages=1493-1500&rft.issn=0360-1323&rft.eissn=1873-684X&rft.coden=BUENDB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.07.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E33925556%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=33925556&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0360132308001911&rfr_iscdi=true