The cross–sectional association between ultra-processed food intake and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

The prevalence of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease has increased in parallel with a rise in consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPF), but little is known about their association. We cross-sectionally examined associations of UPF with hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in 2458 (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical nutrition ESPEN 2025-04, Vol.66, p.215-220
Hauptverfasser: Sun, Natalie, Prescott, Brenton, Ma, Jiantao, Xanthakis, Vanessa, Quatromoni, Paula A., Long, Michelle T., Walker, Maura E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The prevalence of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease has increased in parallel with a rise in consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPF), but little is known about their association. We cross-sectionally examined associations of UPF with hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in 2458 (mean age 54 years; 55.9 % women) community-dwelling adults who completed vibration-controlled transient elastography and a food frequency questionnaire. Dietary intake was categorized into levels of food processing via the NOVA system. We used multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models to evaluate the association of energy-adjusted UPF intake (per 1-SD unit and by quintile) with clinical hepatic steatosis (Controlled Attenuation Parameter [CAP]≥ 290 dB/m) and fibrosis (Liver Stiffness Measurement [LSM] ≥ 8.2 kPa) and tested for linear trends of UPF intake with CAP and LSM. We adjusted for age, sex, smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity, and intake of minimally processed foods. Additional models adjusted for diet quality index or body mass index (BMI). Higher intake of UPF was directly associated with higher odds of hepatic steatosis (Odds Ratio 1.33 [95 % Confidence Interval 1.21, 1.46] per standard deviation increase). UPF intake and CAP had a dose–response relation (Ptrend
ISSN:2405-4577
2405-4577
DOI:10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.01.045