A Clinical Practice-Based Comparison of Conventional and Individualized Dosing Strategies for Therapeutic Enoxaparin

To understand differences in anti-factor-Xa levels produced by two different dosing strategies (conventional and individualized) for therapeutic enoxaparin in a cohort of hospital inpatients. A multicenter, retrospective cohort study over a two- and a half-year period for inpatients with stable rena...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pharmacology research & perspectives 2025-02, Vol.13 (1), p.e70039
Hauptverfasser: Damiani, Anthony, De Menezes Caceres, Viviane, Roberts, Greg, Coddo, Jessica, Scarfo, Nicholas, Willliams, Desmond B, Tharmathurai, Vinosshini, Tadros, Rami, Fitzgerald, Stephen, O'Connell, Alice, Kaur Sandhu, Amrit, Vanlint, Andrew, Mangoni, Arduino A, Hofmann, Dirk, Bony, Hosam, Faunt, Jeff, Boey, Jir Ping, Farinola, Nicholas, Wells, Rachel, Hedger, Stephen, Hewage, Udul, Sharma, Yogesh, Jabbar, Zuhair, Thomas, Josephine, Flabouris, Katerina, Gilbert, Toby, Thompson, Campbell, Russell, Patrick
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To understand differences in anti-factor-Xa levels produced by two different dosing strategies (conventional and individualized) for therapeutic enoxaparin in a cohort of hospital inpatients. A multicenter, retrospective cohort study over a two- and a half-year period for inpatients with stable renal function and on therapeutic enoxaparin. Anti-factor-Xa levels were taken 3-5 h after enoxaparin administration and a minimum of 48 h of dosing. The final analysis included 278 patients from five hospitals: conventional dosing was used for 141, while 137 were given an unconventional dose, that is, individualized for their renal function and weight. Out-of-range levels were frequent (35% to 40% of all inpatients). After adjustment for age, renal function, and body mass index (BMI), the conventional group was more likely to experience above-range levels (> 1.0 IU/mL; OR 2.50 [95% CI 1.38-4.56], p 
ISSN:2052-1707
2052-1707
DOI:10.1002/prp2.70039