Evaluating Large Language Models for Automated CPT Code Prediction in Endovascular Neurosurgery

Large language models (LLMs) have been utilized to automate tasks like writing discharge summaries and operative reports in neurosurgery. The present study evaluates their ability to identify current procedural terminology (CPT) codes from operative reports. Three LLMs (ChatGPT 4.0, AtlasGPT and Gem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of medical systems 2025-01, Vol.49 (1), p.15, Article 15
Hauptverfasser: Roy, Joanna M., Self, D. Mitchell, Isch, Emily, Musmar, Basel, Lan, Matthews, Keppetipola, Kavantissa, Koduri, Sravanthi, Pontarelli, Mary-Katharine, Tjoumakaris, Stavropoula I., Gooch, M. Reid, Rosenwasser, Robert H., Jabbour, Pascal M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Large language models (LLMs) have been utilized to automate tasks like writing discharge summaries and operative reports in neurosurgery. The present study evaluates their ability to identify current procedural terminology (CPT) codes from operative reports. Three LLMs (ChatGPT 4.0, AtlasGPT and Gemini) were evaluated in their ability to provide CPT codes for diagnostic or interventional procedures in endovascular neurosurgery at a single institution. Responses were classified as correct, partially correct or incorrect, and the percentage of correctly identified CPT codes were calculated. The Chi-Square test and Kruskal Wallis test were used to compare responses across LLMs. A total of 30 operative notes were used in the present study. AtlasGPT identified CPT codes for 98.3% procedures with partially correct responses, while ChatGPT and Gemini provided partially correct responses for 86.7% and 30% procedures, respectively ( P  
ISSN:1573-689X
0148-5598
1573-689X
DOI:10.1007/s10916-025-02149-4