Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1 Safety Study of Oral Mucosal Immunotherapy in Peanut Allergic Adults
Oral Mucosal Immunotherapy (OMIT) uses a specifically formulated toothpaste to deliver allergenic proteins to immunologically active areas of the oral cavity. This represents a new delivery mechanism with several features designed to improve food allergy desensitization. OMIT presents advantages ove...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of allergy, asthma, & immunology asthma, & immunology, 2025-01 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Oral Mucosal Immunotherapy (OMIT) uses a specifically formulated toothpaste to deliver allergenic proteins to immunologically active areas of the oral cavity. This represents a new delivery mechanism with several features designed to improve food allergy desensitization. OMIT presents advantages over other approaches to allergy immunotherapy due to its targeted delivery and simplified administration.BACKGROUNDOral Mucosal Immunotherapy (OMIT) uses a specifically formulated toothpaste to deliver allergenic proteins to immunologically active areas of the oral cavity. This represents a new delivery mechanism with several features designed to improve food allergy desensitization. OMIT presents advantages over other approaches to allergy immunotherapy due to its targeted delivery and simplified administration.To determine the safety, tolerability, and adherence of OMIT with INT301 in peanut allergic adults.OBJECTIVETo determine the safety, tolerability, and adherence of OMIT with INT301 in peanut allergic adults.This Oral Mucosal Escalation Goal Assessment (OMEGA) study enrolled 32 adults, age 18-55, with peanut allergy in a 3:1 ratio to receive either an escalating dose of INT301 or placebo. Entry criteria included a positive SPT with a wheal diameter ≥ 3mm greater than control and/or psIgE ≥ 0.35 kU/L. Subjects were required to fail an oral food challenge ≤ 100 mg dose of peanut protein. Safety and tolerability were monitored during this 48-week trial.METHODSThis Oral Mucosal Escalation Goal Assessment (OMEGA) study enrolled 32 adults, age 18-55, with peanut allergy in a 3:1 ratio to receive either an escalating dose of INT301 or placebo. Entry criteria included a positive SPT with a wheal diameter ≥ 3mm greater than control and/or psIgE ≥ 0.35 kU/L. Subjects were required to fail an oral food challenge ≤ 100 mg dose of peanut protein. Safety and tolerability were monitored during this 48-week trial.100% of active subjects tolerated the pre-specified protocol highest dose. No moderate nor severe systemic reactions occurred in active participants. Non-systemic adverse reactions were mostly local (oral and nasal cavity), mild and transient. Active subjects adhered to treatment 97% of days on study, with no withdrawals due to study medication.RESULTS100% of active subjects tolerated the pre-specified protocol highest dose. No moderate nor severe systemic reactions occurred in active participants. Non-systemic adverse reactions were mostly local (oral and nasal c |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1534-4436 1534-4436 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.anai.2025.01.013 |