Phantom-based gradient waveform measurements with compensated variable-prephasing: Description and application to EPI at 7 T

Introducing compensated variable-prephasing (CVP), a phantom-based method for gradient waveform measurements. The technique is based on the variable-prephasing (VP) method, but takes into account the effects of all gradients involved in the measurement. We conducted measurements of a trapezoidal tes...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magnetic resonance in medicine 2025-01
Hauptverfasser: Scholten, Hannah, Wech, Tobias, Homolya, Istvan, Köstler, Herbert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introducing compensated variable-prephasing (CVP), a phantom-based method for gradient waveform measurements. The technique is based on the variable-prephasing (VP) method, but takes into account the effects of all gradients involved in the measurement. We conducted measurements of a trapezoidal test gradient and of an EPI readout gradient train with three approaches: VP, CVP, and fully compensated variable-prephasing (FCVP). We compared them to one another and to predictions based on the gradient system transfer function. Furthermore, we used the measured and predicted EPI gradients for trajectory corrections in phantom images on a 7 T scanner. The VP gradient measurements are confounded by lingering oscillations of the prephasing gradients, which are compensated in the CVP and FCVP measurements. FCVP is vulnerable to a sign asymmetry in the gradient chain. However, the trajectories determined by all three methods resulted in comparably high EPI image quality. We present a new approach allowing for phantom-based gradient waveform measurements with high precision, which can be useful for trajectory corrections in non-Cartesian or single-shot imaging techniques. In our experimental setup, the proposed "compensated variable-prephasing" method provided the most reliable gradient measurements of the different techniques we compared.
ISSN:0740-3194
1522-2594
1522-2594
DOI:10.1002/mrm.30425