Selection and adaptation to weed management methods: implications for non‐chemical and integrated weed management approaches

Herbicide‐resistant weeds are a growing global concern, threatening food security. Non‐chemical weed management approaches are becoming increasingly important. Furthermore, the adoption of non‐conventional agricultural practices is on the rise, with regenerative farming practices aimed at rebuilding soil organic matter, restoring biodiversity, and reducing chemical use gaining traction. Consequently, non‐chemical weed management methods are seen as essential solutions. However, excessive reliance on these methods may inadvertently lead to weed selection and adaptation, reducing their effectiveness. Here, we explore the mechanisms driving changes in efficacy due to selectivity and adaptation to non‐chemical weed management practices. Additionally, we discuss potential integrated weed management (IWM) strategies that combine chemical and non‐chemical methods to mitigate the risks of weed adaptation. This study highlights the role of evolutionary processes in shaping weed adaptation to non‐chemical weed management methods and underscores the need to understand these processes to develop IWM approaches that remain effective over time. Monitoring phenological shifts and adaptations in the field should be a key component of decision support systems, tailored to the unique conditions of each site. Furthermore, a deeper understanding of weed adaptation mechanisms can enhance the efficacy of IWM strategies and help delay the inevitable adaptation to these control methods. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry. This study highlights the role of evolutionary processes in shaping weed adaptation to non‐chemical weed management methods and underscores the need to understand these processes to develop sustainable integrated weed management approaches that remain effective over time.