The vascular influence of melatonin on endothelial response to angiotensin II in diabetic rat aorta

The current study explored melatonin (MEL) and its receptors, including MEL type 1 receptor (MT1) receptor and MEL type 2 receptor (MT2), along with the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE 2 ), influence on vascular responses to angiotensin II (Ang II) in rat aortic segments of normal and diabetic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes 2024-10, Vol.56 (5), p.531-542
Hauptverfasser: Mahmood, Nazar M.Shareef, Mahmud, Almas MR, Maulood, Ismail M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The current study explored melatonin (MEL) and its receptors, including MEL type 1 receptor (MT1) receptor and MEL type 2 receptor (MT2), along with the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE 2 ), influence on vascular responses to angiotensin II (Ang II) in rat aortic segments of normal and diabetic rats. The isolated aortic segments were exposed to MEL, the MEL agonist; ramelteon (RAM), the MEL antagonist; luzindole (LUZ), and an ACE 2 inhibitor (S, S)-2-(1-Carboxy-2-(3-(3,5-dichlorobenzyl)-3 H-imidazol-4-yl)-ethylamino)-4-methylpentanoic acid,) on Ang II-induced contractions in non-diabetic normal endothelium (non-DM E+), non-diabetic removed endothelium (non-DM E-), and streptozotocin-induced diabetic endothelium-intact (STZ-induced DM E+) rat aortic segments, as well as their combination in STZ-induced DM E + segments, were also included. The current results showed that MEL and RAM shifted Ang II dose-response curve (DRC) to the right side in non-DM E + and non-DM E- aorta but not in STZ-induced DM E + aorta. However, ACE 2 inhibition abolished Ang II degradation only in STZ-induced DM E + segments, not in non-DM E + segments. Additionally, the combinations of MEL-LUZ and RAM-ACE 2 inhibitor caused a rightward shift in Ang II response in STZ-induced DM E + segments, while the MEL-LUZ combination decreased Ang II DRC. The findings suggest that the effects of MEL and ACE 2 inhibitor on Ang II responses depend on the condition of the endothelium and the distribution of the MEL receptors.
ISSN:0145-479X
1573-6881
1573-6881
DOI:10.1007/s10863-024-10032-z