Small effects of family size on sociality despite strong kin preferences in female bottlenose dolphins

The quantity and quality of individual social relationships is a fundamental feature of social structure for group-living species. In many species, individuals preferentially associate with close relatives, which can amplify social benefits through inclusive fitness. Reproductive variation, dispersa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animal behaviour 2023-01, Vol.195, p.53-66
Hauptverfasser: Foroughirad, Vivienne, Frère, Celine H., Levengood, Alexis L., Kopps, Anna M., Krzyszczyk, Ewa, Mann, Janet
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The quantity and quality of individual social relationships is a fundamental feature of social structure for group-living species. In many species, individuals preferentially associate with close relatives, which can amplify social benefits through inclusive fitness. Reproductive variation, dispersal and other factors may nevertheless impact relative kin availability, especially for species with slow life histories. As such, variation in family size can affect the social integration of the individual. Here, we investigated the effects of family size on female sociality in a population of Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops aduncus, in Shark Bay, Australia. This population exhibits high fission–fusion dynamics, with females varying widely in gregariousness and both sexes remaining philopatric, providing females with both matrilineal and nonmatrilineal kin as potential associates. We used genetic relatedness data obtained from a large single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel and a spatially explicit null model to measure females' propensities to form affiliations with both related and unrelated individuals. We found that females had strong social preferences for matrilineal close (first, second and third degree) kin, but also significant preferences for nonmatrilineal close and more distant kin compared to unrelated individuals. Despite these preferences, we found only small effects of kin availability on individual social position. Stronger and more consistent effects were attributable to individual foraging ecology, although much of the variation remains unexplained. Overall, our models suggest that while female dolphins have strong kin preferences, their social connectivity is not determined by family size; rather, individual foraging strategies and high fission–fusion dynamics enable a diverse repertoire of social strategies to coexist within a population. •We investigated effects of family size on female sociability in Tursiops aduncus.•Females had strong social preferences for matrilineal and nonmatrilineal kin.•Matrilineal close kin had small effects on number of affiliations and centrality.•Number of kin had no effect on affiliations with unrelated individuals.•Family size explained only a small amount of variation in female sociability.
ISSN:0003-3472
1095-8282
DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2022.10.011