Were consumers of plant-based beef substitutes buyers of organic or grass-fed beef? Insights from correlations in willingness to pay
Organic and grass-fed beef serve as niche alternatives to conventionally grain-fed beef. A recent addition is plant-based beef substitutes, all three of which are marketed as environmentally friendly options. Despite this, it remains uncertain which specific products plant-based beef substitutes are...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cleaner production 2024-05, Vol.452, p.142176, Article 142176 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Organic and grass-fed beef serve as niche alternatives to conventionally grain-fed beef. A recent addition is plant-based beef substitutes, all three of which are marketed as environmentally friendly options. Despite this, it remains uncertain which specific products plant-based beef substitutes are most directly competing with. In this study, we investigate the correlations between the willingness to pay for plant-based beef substitutes and organic/grass-fed beef using a choice experiment and the Willingness to Pay Space model. Our findings indicate positive correlations between consumers' preferences for plant-based, organic, and grass-fed beef. This suggests that plant-based beef consumers are more likely to be prior consumers of organic or grass-fed beef. Given their relatively small market shares, novel beef substitutes could pose intense competition to the ecolabeled products. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0959-6526 1879-1786 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142176 |