Occurrence of F-Specific Bacteriophages in Untreated and Treated Wastewaters in Mumbai

F + coliphages are considered as potential enteric viral indicators in water systems as a tool for on-site validation of wastewater treatment processes. The present study evaluated the occurrence of F + coliphages in wastewaters collected from three wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Mumbai city...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Indian journal of microbiology 2024-03, Vol.64 (1), p.254-259
Hauptverfasser: Menon, Smita, Wani, Hima, Desai, Dipen, Bhathena, Zarine, Desai, Nishith, Shrivastava, Sandhya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:F + coliphages are considered as potential enteric viral indicators in water systems as a tool for on-site validation of wastewater treatment processes. The present study evaluated the occurrence of F + coliphages in wastewaters collected from three wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Mumbai city, to assess this potential. The detection and enumeration of F + coliphages was carried out from WWTPs Z1, Z3 and Z5 using the ISO 10705–1 and U.S EPA 1601 methods. F + coliphages were majorly detected in untreated wastewater samples followed by a few secondary treated samples in WWTP-Z1 and Z3 and one tertiary treated sample from Z1, these differences were found to be statistically significant. The difference in F + coliphage levels between the treatment stages highlight their potential as indicators for monitoring the efficiency of wastewater treatment. The overall positivity of F + coliphage was 35.09% for Salmonella. typhimurium WG49 host (as per ISO 10705–1), was higher by 10.52% for Escherichia coli F amp HS host (as per U.S EPA 1601) (45.61%), highlighting the efficiency of the latter host over the former in F + coliphage detection. Significant difference in F + coliphage counts using the two bacterial hosts were observed in WWTP-Z3 ( p  =  0.001 ) and WWTP-Z1 ( p  =  0.047 ) but not in WWTP-Z5 ( p  =  0.332 ).
ISSN:0046-8991
0973-7715
DOI:10.1007/s12088-023-01181-7