A systematic review and meta-analysis of the potential effect of medicinal plants on innate immunity of selected freshwater fish species: its implications for fish farming in Southern Africa

One of the major bottlenecks affecting the expansion of the freshwater aquaculture sector in developing countries is the outbreak of diseases. Fish farmers have traditionally relied on antibiotics and synthetic chemicals to control diseases. However, antibiotics and synthetic chemicals are associate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aquaculture international 2024-02, Vol.32 (1), p.315-335
Hauptverfasser: Mbokane, Esau Matthews, Moyo, Ngonidzashe Adreck Gukuta
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:One of the major bottlenecks affecting the expansion of the freshwater aquaculture sector in developing countries is the outbreak of diseases. Fish farmers have traditionally relied on antibiotics and synthetic chemicals to control diseases. However, antibiotics and synthetic chemicals are associated with negative effects on the environment and consumers and their excessive use has resulted in antibiotic-resistant pathogens. In addition, the majority of freshwater fish farmers, especially small-scale farmers, have limited access to antibiotics and synthetic chemicals due to lack of resources. Medicinal plants have been reported to be suitable replacements in aquaculture, but their usage in aquaculture is still limited. The aim of this paper is to undertake a meta-analysis on the effect of medicinal plants on innate immune response and disease resistance in commonly farmed freshwater aquaculture fish species, namely Mozambique tilapia ( Oreochromis mossambicus ), African catfish ( Clarias gariepinus ), trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ), and cyprinids ( Labeo rohita and Cyprinus carpio ). The analysis showed that the mean effect size for respiratory burst (− 1.90 (95% CI − 2.40; − 1.40), I 2  = 100%, P  = 0); lysozyme activity (0.05 (95% CI − 0.38; 0.48), I 2  = 97%, P  
ISSN:0967-6120
1573-143X
DOI:10.1007/s10499-023-01160-1