Surviving the potato stems: differences in genes required for fitness by Dickeya dadantii and Dickeya dianthicola

Bacteria belonging to the genus cause blackleg and soft rot symptoms on many plant hosts, including potato. Although there is considerable knowledge about the genetic determinants that allow to colonize host plants, as well as the genes that contribute to virulence, much is still unknown. To identif...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Phytopathology 2024-05, Vol.114 (5), p.1106-1117
Hauptverfasser: González-Tobón, Juliana, Helmann, Tyler C, Stodghill, Paul, Filiatrault, Melanie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Bacteria belonging to the genus cause blackleg and soft rot symptoms on many plant hosts, including potato. Although there is considerable knowledge about the genetic determinants that allow to colonize host plants, as well as the genes that contribute to virulence, much is still unknown. To identify the genes important for fitness in potato stems, we constructed and evaluated randomly-barcoded transposon mutant (RB-TnSeq) libraries of and . We identified 169 and 157 genes important for growth in and in stems, respectively. This included gene related to metabolic pathways, chemotaxis and motility, transcriptional regulation, transport across membranes, membrane biogenesis, detoxification mechanisms, and virulence-related genes including a potential virulence cluster , c-di-GMP modulating genes, and pectin degradation genes. Comparing the results of the stem assay with other datasets, we identified genes important for growth in stems versus tubers and conditions. Additionally, our data showed differences in fitness determinants for and . This data provides important insights into the mechanisms used by when interacting with and colonizing plants, and thus might provide targets for management.
ISSN:0031-949X
1943-7684
DOI:10.1094/PHYTO-09-23-0351-KC