Comparison of compost, PGPR, and AMF in the biological control of tomato Fusarium wilt disease
Soil-borne fungal infections reduce yields, and result in severe economic losses by destroying the root, stem, and vascular components of many plants. For disease management that is efficient, inexpensive, and has no adverse effects on the environment, the use of biocontrol materials is crucial. In...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of plant pathology 2023-12, Vol.167 (4), p.771-786 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 786 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 771 |
| container_title | European journal of plant pathology |
| container_volume | 167 |
| creator | Bilgili, Ayşin Bilgili, Ali Volkan |
| description | Soil-borne fungal infections reduce yields, and result in severe economic losses by destroying the root, stem, and vascular components of many plants. For disease management that is efficient, inexpensive, and has no adverse effects on the environment, the use of biocontrol materials is crucial. In this study, three different biocontrol agents were evaluated for their ability to reduce the stress that
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici (FOL)
causes in tomato plants. These agents included compost made from locally accessible green wastes, a strain of bacteria (
Bacillus subtilis
strain ®Serenade), and arbuscular mychorrizal fungi (®Mikostar). Using correlation and PCA analysis, the effects of these agents on FOL disease were further linked to nutrient intake, physicochemical properties of plants, and the rhizosphere. Five different applications were used in the experiment, which was carried out in controlled conditions utilizing a completely random experimental design: pathogen-inoculated positive control (A), non-inoculated negative control (B), A + compost (C), A + AMF (D), and A +
Bacillus subtilis
(E). There were statistically significant differences (
p
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10658-023-02710-2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153558111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3153558111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-29f85080485d8d63034408d9715ff30a2fa6bb16f374f7a851289dfad776f07e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEURoMoWKsv4CrgxkVH8zOZJMtSbBUUi-jWkM4kNWVmUpMM4tubWkFw4eISbjjn4_IBcI7RFUaIX0eMKiYKRGgejlFBDsAIM04LUVbyEIyQJLLAgtNjcBLjBmVJSjICrzPfbXVw0ffQW1jnzcc0gcvF8mkCdd_A6cMcuh6mNwNXzrd-7WrdZrBPwbc7J_lOJw_nQ8w5Qwc_XJtg46LR0ZyCI6vbaM5-3jF4md88z26L-8fF3Wx6X9QU0VQQaQVDApWCNaKp8l9ZItFIjpm1FGlidbVa4cpSXlquBcNEyMbqhvPKIm7oGFzuc7fBvw8mJtW5WJu21b3xQ1QUM8qYwBhn9OIPuvFD6PN1KodiSXhJWKbInqqDjzEYq7bBdTp8KozUrnK1r1zlytV35Ypkie6lmOF-bcJv9D_WF7jDgds</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2891927425</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of compost, PGPR, and AMF in the biological control of tomato Fusarium wilt disease</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Bilgili, Ayşin ; Bilgili, Ali Volkan</creator><creatorcontrib>Bilgili, Ayşin ; Bilgili, Ali Volkan</creatorcontrib><description>Soil-borne fungal infections reduce yields, and result in severe economic losses by destroying the root, stem, and vascular components of many plants. For disease management that is efficient, inexpensive, and has no adverse effects on the environment, the use of biocontrol materials is crucial. In this study, three different biocontrol agents were evaluated for their ability to reduce the stress that
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici (FOL)
causes in tomato plants. These agents included compost made from locally accessible green wastes, a strain of bacteria (
Bacillus subtilis
strain ®Serenade), and arbuscular mychorrizal fungi (®Mikostar). Using correlation and PCA analysis, the effects of these agents on FOL disease were further linked to nutrient intake, physicochemical properties of plants, and the rhizosphere. Five different applications were used in the experiment, which was carried out in controlled conditions utilizing a completely random experimental design: pathogen-inoculated positive control (A), non-inoculated negative control (B), A + compost (C), A + AMF (D), and A +
Bacillus subtilis
(E). There were statistically significant differences (
p
< 0.05) between groups in terms of the indicators of plant disease as well as the other parameters studied, according to ANOVA-Tukey analysis. Compost proved to be the most effective treatment among the three materials evaluated, reducing disease severity by up to 100%, followed by AMF (36.4%) and Bacteria (34.1%). The LAI, shoot fresh and dry weight, SPAD values, plant nutrient contents (N, Ca, Mg, Mn), and parameters assessed in the rhizosphere (B, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Dehydrogenase, and CO
2
respiration) were the highest in pots treated with compost, and all had statistically significant negative correlations with disease severity (
p
< 0.05). The results show that compost made from local green waste could be effective in reducing tomato FOL disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0929-1873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8469</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10658-023-02710-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Bacillus subtilis ; Bacteria ; Biological control ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Calcium ; Carbon dioxide ; Composting ; Composts ; Controlled conditions ; Design of experiments ; disease control ; disease severity ; Ecology ; Economic impact ; Environmental effects ; Experimental design ; Food intake ; fungi ; Fusarium oxysporum ; Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici ; Fusarium wilt ; green waste ; Life Sciences ; Magnesium ; Manganese ; nutrient intake ; Nutrients ; oxidoreductases ; Parameters ; Physicochemical properties ; Plant diseases ; Plant Pathology ; Plant Sciences ; Rhizosphere ; Statistical analysis ; Tomatoes ; Variance analysis ; Wilt</subject><ispartof>European journal of plant pathology, 2023-12, Vol.167 (4), p.771-786</ispartof><rights>Koninklijke Nederlandse Planteziektenkundige Vereniging 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-29f85080485d8d63034408d9715ff30a2fa6bb16f374f7a851289dfad776f07e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0801-0484</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10658-023-02710-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10658-023-02710-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bilgili, Ayşin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilgili, Ali Volkan</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of compost, PGPR, and AMF in the biological control of tomato Fusarium wilt disease</title><title>European journal of plant pathology</title><addtitle>Eur J Plant Pathol</addtitle><description>Soil-borne fungal infections reduce yields, and result in severe economic losses by destroying the root, stem, and vascular components of many plants. For disease management that is efficient, inexpensive, and has no adverse effects on the environment, the use of biocontrol materials is crucial. In this study, three different biocontrol agents were evaluated for their ability to reduce the stress that
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici (FOL)
causes in tomato plants. These agents included compost made from locally accessible green wastes, a strain of bacteria (
Bacillus subtilis
strain ®Serenade), and arbuscular mychorrizal fungi (®Mikostar). Using correlation and PCA analysis, the effects of these agents on FOL disease were further linked to nutrient intake, physicochemical properties of plants, and the rhizosphere. Five different applications were used in the experiment, which was carried out in controlled conditions utilizing a completely random experimental design: pathogen-inoculated positive control (A), non-inoculated negative control (B), A + compost (C), A + AMF (D), and A +
Bacillus subtilis
(E). There were statistically significant differences (
p
< 0.05) between groups in terms of the indicators of plant disease as well as the other parameters studied, according to ANOVA-Tukey analysis. Compost proved to be the most effective treatment among the three materials evaluated, reducing disease severity by up to 100%, followed by AMF (36.4%) and Bacteria (34.1%). The LAI, shoot fresh and dry weight, SPAD values, plant nutrient contents (N, Ca, Mg, Mn), and parameters assessed in the rhizosphere (B, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Dehydrogenase, and CO
2
respiration) were the highest in pots treated with compost, and all had statistically significant negative correlations with disease severity (
p
< 0.05). The results show that compost made from local green waste could be effective in reducing tomato FOL disease.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Bacillus subtilis</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biological control</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Composting</subject><subject>Composts</subject><subject>Controlled conditions</subject><subject>Design of experiments</subject><subject>disease control</subject><subject>disease severity</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Environmental effects</subject><subject>Experimental design</subject><subject>Food intake</subject><subject>fungi</subject><subject>Fusarium oxysporum</subject><subject>Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici</subject><subject>Fusarium wilt</subject><subject>green waste</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Magnesium</subject><subject>Manganese</subject><subject>nutrient intake</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>oxidoreductases</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Physicochemical properties</subject><subject>Plant diseases</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Rhizosphere</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Tomatoes</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Wilt</subject><issn>0929-1873</issn><issn>1573-8469</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEURoMoWKsv4CrgxkVH8zOZJMtSbBUUi-jWkM4kNWVmUpMM4tubWkFw4eISbjjn4_IBcI7RFUaIX0eMKiYKRGgejlFBDsAIM04LUVbyEIyQJLLAgtNjcBLjBmVJSjICrzPfbXVw0ffQW1jnzcc0gcvF8mkCdd_A6cMcuh6mNwNXzrd-7WrdZrBPwbc7J_lOJw_nQ8w5Qwc_XJtg46LR0ZyCI6vbaM5-3jF4md88z26L-8fF3Wx6X9QU0VQQaQVDApWCNaKp8l9ZItFIjpm1FGlidbVa4cpSXlquBcNEyMbqhvPKIm7oGFzuc7fBvw8mJtW5WJu21b3xQ1QUM8qYwBhn9OIPuvFD6PN1KodiSXhJWKbInqqDjzEYq7bBdTp8KozUrnK1r1zlytV35Ypkie6lmOF-bcJv9D_WF7jDgds</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Bilgili, Ayşin</creator><creator>Bilgili, Ali Volkan</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0801-0484</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Comparison of compost, PGPR, and AMF in the biological control of tomato Fusarium wilt disease</title><author>Bilgili, Ayşin ; Bilgili, Ali Volkan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-29f85080485d8d63034408d9715ff30a2fa6bb16f374f7a851289dfad776f07e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Bacillus subtilis</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biological control</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Composting</topic><topic>Composts</topic><topic>Controlled conditions</topic><topic>Design of experiments</topic><topic>disease control</topic><topic>disease severity</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Environmental effects</topic><topic>Experimental design</topic><topic>Food intake</topic><topic>fungi</topic><topic>Fusarium oxysporum</topic><topic>Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici</topic><topic>Fusarium wilt</topic><topic>green waste</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Magnesium</topic><topic>Manganese</topic><topic>nutrient intake</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>oxidoreductases</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Physicochemical properties</topic><topic>Plant diseases</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Rhizosphere</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Tomatoes</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Wilt</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bilgili, Ayşin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilgili, Ali Volkan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of plant pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bilgili, Ayşin</au><au>Bilgili, Ali Volkan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of compost, PGPR, and AMF in the biological control of tomato Fusarium wilt disease</atitle><jtitle>European journal of plant pathology</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Plant Pathol</stitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>167</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>771</spage><epage>786</epage><pages>771-786</pages><issn>0929-1873</issn><eissn>1573-8469</eissn><abstract>Soil-borne fungal infections reduce yields, and result in severe economic losses by destroying the root, stem, and vascular components of many plants. For disease management that is efficient, inexpensive, and has no adverse effects on the environment, the use of biocontrol materials is crucial. In this study, three different biocontrol agents were evaluated for their ability to reduce the stress that
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici (FOL)
causes in tomato plants. These agents included compost made from locally accessible green wastes, a strain of bacteria (
Bacillus subtilis
strain ®Serenade), and arbuscular mychorrizal fungi (®Mikostar). Using correlation and PCA analysis, the effects of these agents on FOL disease were further linked to nutrient intake, physicochemical properties of plants, and the rhizosphere. Five different applications were used in the experiment, which was carried out in controlled conditions utilizing a completely random experimental design: pathogen-inoculated positive control (A), non-inoculated negative control (B), A + compost (C), A + AMF (D), and A +
Bacillus subtilis
(E). There were statistically significant differences (
p
< 0.05) between groups in terms of the indicators of plant disease as well as the other parameters studied, according to ANOVA-Tukey analysis. Compost proved to be the most effective treatment among the three materials evaluated, reducing disease severity by up to 100%, followed by AMF (36.4%) and Bacteria (34.1%). The LAI, shoot fresh and dry weight, SPAD values, plant nutrient contents (N, Ca, Mg, Mn), and parameters assessed in the rhizosphere (B, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Dehydrogenase, and CO
2
respiration) were the highest in pots treated with compost, and all had statistically significant negative correlations with disease severity (
p
< 0.05). The results show that compost made from local green waste could be effective in reducing tomato FOL disease.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10658-023-02710-2</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0801-0484</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0929-1873 |
| ispartof | European journal of plant pathology, 2023-12, Vol.167 (4), p.771-786 |
| issn | 0929-1873 1573-8469 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153558111 |
| source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Agriculture Bacillus subtilis Bacteria Biological control Biomedical and Life Sciences Calcium Carbon dioxide Composting Composts Controlled conditions Design of experiments disease control disease severity Ecology Economic impact Environmental effects Experimental design Food intake fungi Fusarium oxysporum Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici Fusarium wilt green waste Life Sciences Magnesium Manganese nutrient intake Nutrients oxidoreductases Parameters Physicochemical properties Plant diseases Plant Pathology Plant Sciences Rhizosphere Statistical analysis Tomatoes Variance analysis Wilt |
| title | Comparison of compost, PGPR, and AMF in the biological control of tomato Fusarium wilt disease |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T21%3A56%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20compost,%20PGPR,%20and%20AMF%20in%20the%20biological%20control%20of%20tomato%20Fusarium%20wilt%20disease&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20plant%20pathology&rft.au=Bilgili,%20Ay%C5%9Fin&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=167&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=771&rft.epage=786&rft.pages=771-786&rft.issn=0929-1873&rft.eissn=1573-8469&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10658-023-02710-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153558111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2891927425&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |