Comparison of compost, PGPR, and AMF in the biological control of tomato Fusarium wilt disease
Soil-borne fungal infections reduce yields, and result in severe economic losses by destroying the root, stem, and vascular components of many plants. For disease management that is efficient, inexpensive, and has no adverse effects on the environment, the use of biocontrol materials is crucial. In...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of plant pathology 2023-12, Vol.167 (4), p.771-786 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Soil-borne fungal infections reduce yields, and result in severe economic losses by destroying the root, stem, and vascular components of many plants. For disease management that is efficient, inexpensive, and has no adverse effects on the environment, the use of biocontrol materials is crucial. In this study, three different biocontrol agents were evaluated for their ability to reduce the stress that
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici (FOL)
causes in tomato plants. These agents included compost made from locally accessible green wastes, a strain of bacteria (
Bacillus subtilis
strain ®Serenade), and arbuscular mychorrizal fungi (®Mikostar). Using correlation and PCA analysis, the effects of these agents on FOL disease were further linked to nutrient intake, physicochemical properties of plants, and the rhizosphere. Five different applications were used in the experiment, which was carried out in controlled conditions utilizing a completely random experimental design: pathogen-inoculated positive control (A), non-inoculated negative control (B), A + compost (C), A + AMF (D), and A +
Bacillus subtilis
(E). There were statistically significant differences (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0929-1873 1573-8469 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10658-023-02710-2 |