Comparison of compost, PGPR, and AMF in the biological control of tomato Fusarium wilt disease

Soil-borne fungal infections reduce yields, and result in severe economic losses by destroying the root, stem, and vascular components of many plants. For disease management that is efficient, inexpensive, and has no adverse effects on the environment, the use of biocontrol materials is crucial. In...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of plant pathology 2023-12, Vol.167 (4), p.771-786
Hauptverfasser: Bilgili, Ayşin, Bilgili, Ali Volkan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Soil-borne fungal infections reduce yields, and result in severe economic losses by destroying the root, stem, and vascular components of many plants. For disease management that is efficient, inexpensive, and has no adverse effects on the environment, the use of biocontrol materials is crucial. In this study, three different biocontrol agents were evaluated for their ability to reduce the stress that Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici (FOL) causes in tomato plants. These agents included compost made from locally accessible green wastes, a strain of bacteria ( Bacillus subtilis strain ®Serenade), and arbuscular mychorrizal fungi (®Mikostar). Using correlation and PCA analysis, the effects of these agents on FOL disease were further linked to nutrient intake, physicochemical properties of plants, and the rhizosphere. Five different applications were used in the experiment, which was carried out in controlled conditions utilizing a completely random experimental design: pathogen-inoculated positive control (A), non-inoculated negative control (B), A + compost (C), A + AMF (D), and A +  Bacillus subtilis (E). There were statistically significant differences ( p  
ISSN:0929-1873
1573-8469
DOI:10.1007/s10658-023-02710-2