Fire exclusion vs. a fire-free interval following repeated prescribed fire: Consequences for forest stand structure and species composition in an upland oak forest

•Continued fire exclusion led to increased red maple stem density.•A fire-free period after prescribed fire increased oak and hard pine regeneration.•Differences between fire treatments reveal landscape variability in fire effects.•Natural disturbance following prescribed fire proved effective for oak recruitment.•Repeated fire after a fire-free interval will be needed to maintain oak dominance. In the Central Appalachian forest region, oaks (Quercus L.) and other disturbance-dependent tree species are experiencing widespread regeneration failure after decades of fire suppression. Managers use prescribed fire to decrease basal area with the aim of facilitating oak regeneration and shifting species composition toward pyrophytic species that dominate the overstory. Although fire may set the stage for improved oak regeneration, a fire-free period is necessary for oak seedlings to develop into fire-resistant stems. The effects of prescribed fire have been amply investigated across the region, but few studies have examined changes to stand structure and oak regeneration after cessation of burning. We followed the effects of three treatments, fire-excluded, 3x-burned, and 4x-burned, for 20 years. After a fire-free interval of approximately ten years, burned treatments had significantly lower total basal area and greater relative density of oaks in the subcanopy (10–20 cm DBH) than the fire-excluded treatment. The 4x-burned, which had the greatest reduction in basal area, also had greater relative density of midstory oaks (2–10 cm DBH), and higher stem density of oak regeneration (