An artificial neural network to estimate the foliar and ground cover input variables of the Rangeland Hydrology and Erosion Model
Models like the Rangeland Hydrology and Erosion Model (RHEM) are useful for estimating soil erosion, however, they rely on input parameters that are sometimes difficult or expensive to measure. Specifically, RHEM requires information about foliar and ground cover fractions that generally must be mea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2024-03, Vol.631, p.130835, Article 130835 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Models like the Rangeland Hydrology and Erosion Model (RHEM) are useful for estimating soil erosion, however, they rely on input parameters that are sometimes difficult or expensive to measure. Specifically, RHEM requires information about foliar and ground cover fractions that generally must be measured in situ, which makes it difficult to use models like RHEM to produce erosion or soil risk maps for areas exceeding the size of a hillslope such as a large watershed. We previously developed a deep learning emulator of RHEM that has low computational expense and can, in principle, be run over large areas (e.g., over the continental US). In this paper, we develop a deep learning model to estimate the RHEM ground cover inputs from remote sensing time series, reducing the need for extensive field surveys to produce erosion maps. We achieve a prediction accuracy on hillslope runoff of R2≈0.9, and on soil loss and sediment yield of R2≈0.4 at 66,643 field locations within the US. We demonstrate how this approach can be used for mapping by developing runoff, soil loss, and sediment yield maps over a 1356 km2 region of interest in Nebraska.
•We developed a deep learning model estimating the ground cover inputs of the RHEM.•Litter and Shrubs are the most and Bio Crusts is the least accurate estimations.•We achieved an R2≈0.9 for runoff and ≈0.4 for soil loss by the estimated covers. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-1694 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130835 |