Diagnostic value of SAT-TB in stool and urine samples for intestinal and urinary tuberculosis

•Sensitivity and specificity for stool samples: 53.33 %, 93.88 % (SAT-TB), 60 %, 81.63 % (Xpert).•SAT-TB and Xpert showed moderate consistency with clinical diagnosis (Kappa: 0.48, 0.42).•SAT-TB sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for urine samples: 27.27 %, 98.28 %, 0.628.•Combining SAT-TB, Xpert, an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease 2025-03, Vol.111 (3), p.116672, Article 116672
Hauptverfasser: Wei, Zhao, Khan, Muhammad Tahir, Zhiyu, Feng, Min, Wang, Hong, Zhang, Yuan, Yuan, Di, Wu, Zeying, Chen, Xianlin, Huang, Yaoju, Tan, Haobin, Kuang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 116672
container_title Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease
container_volume 111
creator Wei, Zhao
Khan, Muhammad Tahir
Zhiyu, Feng
Min, Wang
Hong, Zhang
Yuan, Yuan
Di, Wu
Zeying, Chen
Xianlin, Huang
Yaoju, Tan
Haobin, Kuang
description •Sensitivity and specificity for stool samples: 53.33 %, 93.88 % (SAT-TB), 60 %, 81.63 % (Xpert).•SAT-TB and Xpert showed moderate consistency with clinical diagnosis (Kappa: 0.48, 0.42).•SAT-TB sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for urine samples: 27.27 %, 98.28 %, 0.628.•Combining SAT-TB, Xpert, and MGIT960 culture improved diagnostic efficacy for stool samples (AUC: 0.823).•SAT-TB had the lowest diagnostic efficacy for urine samples; combined methods increased AUC. The simultaneous amplification/testing for tuberculosis (SAT-TB) targets specific 16s rRNA for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis in real-time. To evaluate SAT-TB's performance in detecting intestinal and urinary TB using stool and urine samples. Stool (94) and urine samples (69) (From 2021 to 2022), were collected from pulmonary combined with suspected intestinal or urinary tuberculosis. Simultaneous detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis was performed using the SAT-TB method, Xpert MTB/RIF assay, and MGIT960 culture. For stool samples, the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were 53.33 %, 93.88 %, and 0.736 for SAT-TB; 60 %, 81.63 %, and 0.708 for Xpert; and 40 %, 95.92 %, and 0.680 for MGIT960. For urine samples, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for SAT-TB, Xpert, and MGIT960 were 27.27 %, 98.28 %, 0.628; 54.55 %, 96.35 %, 0.755; and 45.45 %, 100 %, 0.727, respectively. ROC analysis indicated that SAT-TB had the highest diagnostic efficacy for stool samples when tested individually.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116672
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3150835434</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0732889324004966</els_id><sourcerecordid>3150835434</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1685-2ff7283ab17f4936ddeb5fb3cd046e3c1e0b9cc4bc666a08b7913db57b66c5473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkLlOxDAQhi0EguV4BWRR0WSxY8dO6LhBQqJgKZHlY4K8SuLFTpB4e4yWq6SaYr5_jg-hI0rmlFBxspw7r196b2MwPsxLUvI5pULIcgPNaC2bghBJNtGMSFYWdd2wHbSb0pIQWjacbKMd1kheSlLN0PNlHjWENHqL33Q3AQ4tfjxbFItz7AecxhA6rAeHp-gHwEn3qw4SbkPM7RFybtC_gI7veJwMRDt1Ifm0j7Za3SU4-Kp76On6anFxW9w_3NxdnN0Xloq6Ksq2lWXNtKGy5Q0TzoGpWsOsI1wAsxSIaazlxgohNKmNbChzppJGCFtxyfbQ8XruKobXKV-lep8sdJ0eIExJMVqRmlWc8YyertFsL6UIrVpF3-fDFSXqU69aqr961adetdabw4dfeybTg_uJfvvMwOUagPztm4eokvUwWHA-gh2VC_4_ez4AxC-TMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3150835434</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic value of SAT-TB in stool and urine samples for intestinal and urinary tuberculosis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Wei, Zhao ; Khan, Muhammad Tahir ; Zhiyu, Feng ; Min, Wang ; Hong, Zhang ; Yuan, Yuan ; Di, Wu ; Zeying, Chen ; Xianlin, Huang ; Yaoju, Tan ; Haobin, Kuang</creator><creatorcontrib>Wei, Zhao ; Khan, Muhammad Tahir ; Zhiyu, Feng ; Min, Wang ; Hong, Zhang ; Yuan, Yuan ; Di, Wu ; Zeying, Chen ; Xianlin, Huang ; Yaoju, Tan ; Haobin, Kuang</creatorcontrib><description>•Sensitivity and specificity for stool samples: 53.33 %, 93.88 % (SAT-TB), 60 %, 81.63 % (Xpert).•SAT-TB and Xpert showed moderate consistency with clinical diagnosis (Kappa: 0.48, 0.42).•SAT-TB sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for urine samples: 27.27 %, 98.28 %, 0.628.•Combining SAT-TB, Xpert, and MGIT960 culture improved diagnostic efficacy for stool samples (AUC: 0.823).•SAT-TB had the lowest diagnostic efficacy for urine samples; combined methods increased AUC. The simultaneous amplification/testing for tuberculosis (SAT-TB) targets specific 16s rRNA for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis in real-time. To evaluate SAT-TB's performance in detecting intestinal and urinary TB using stool and urine samples. Stool (94) and urine samples (69) (From 2021 to 2022), were collected from pulmonary combined with suspected intestinal or urinary tuberculosis. Simultaneous detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis was performed using the SAT-TB method, Xpert MTB/RIF assay, and MGIT960 culture. For stool samples, the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were 53.33 %, 93.88 %, and 0.736 for SAT-TB; 60 %, 81.63 %, and 0.708 for Xpert; and 40 %, 95.92 %, and 0.680 for MGIT960. For urine samples, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for SAT-TB, Xpert, and MGIT960 were 27.27 %, 98.28 %, 0.628; 54.55 %, 96.35 %, 0.755; and 45.45 %, 100 %, 0.727, respectively. ROC analysis indicated that SAT-TB had the highest diagnostic efficacy for stool samples when tested individually.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-8893</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-0070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0070</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116672</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39742705</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Intestinal tuberculosis ; SAT ; SAT-TB ; Urinary tuberculosis</subject><ispartof>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 2025-03, Vol.111 (3), p.116672, Article 116672</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1685-2ff7283ab17f4936ddeb5fb3cd046e3c1e0b9cc4bc666a08b7913db57b66c5473</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1158-2133</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116672$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39742705$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wei, Zhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Muhammad Tahir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhiyu, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min, Wang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Zhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di, Wu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeying, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xianlin, Huang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaoju, Tan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haobin, Kuang</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic value of SAT-TB in stool and urine samples for intestinal and urinary tuberculosis</title><title>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease</title><addtitle>Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><description>•Sensitivity and specificity for stool samples: 53.33 %, 93.88 % (SAT-TB), 60 %, 81.63 % (Xpert).•SAT-TB and Xpert showed moderate consistency with clinical diagnosis (Kappa: 0.48, 0.42).•SAT-TB sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for urine samples: 27.27 %, 98.28 %, 0.628.•Combining SAT-TB, Xpert, and MGIT960 culture improved diagnostic efficacy for stool samples (AUC: 0.823).•SAT-TB had the lowest diagnostic efficacy for urine samples; combined methods increased AUC. The simultaneous amplification/testing for tuberculosis (SAT-TB) targets specific 16s rRNA for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis in real-time. To evaluate SAT-TB's performance in detecting intestinal and urinary TB using stool and urine samples. Stool (94) and urine samples (69) (From 2021 to 2022), were collected from pulmonary combined with suspected intestinal or urinary tuberculosis. Simultaneous detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis was performed using the SAT-TB method, Xpert MTB/RIF assay, and MGIT960 culture. For stool samples, the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were 53.33 %, 93.88 %, and 0.736 for SAT-TB; 60 %, 81.63 %, and 0.708 for Xpert; and 40 %, 95.92 %, and 0.680 for MGIT960. For urine samples, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for SAT-TB, Xpert, and MGIT960 were 27.27 %, 98.28 %, 0.628; 54.55 %, 96.35 %, 0.755; and 45.45 %, 100 %, 0.727, respectively. ROC analysis indicated that SAT-TB had the highest diagnostic efficacy for stool samples when tested individually.</description><subject>Intestinal tuberculosis</subject><subject>SAT</subject><subject>SAT-TB</subject><subject>Urinary tuberculosis</subject><issn>0732-8893</issn><issn>1879-0070</issn><issn>1879-0070</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkLlOxDAQhi0EguV4BWRR0WSxY8dO6LhBQqJgKZHlY4K8SuLFTpB4e4yWq6SaYr5_jg-hI0rmlFBxspw7r196b2MwPsxLUvI5pULIcgPNaC2bghBJNtGMSFYWdd2wHbSb0pIQWjacbKMd1kheSlLN0PNlHjWENHqL33Q3AQ4tfjxbFItz7AecxhA6rAeHp-gHwEn3qw4SbkPM7RFybtC_gI7veJwMRDt1Ifm0j7Za3SU4-Kp76On6anFxW9w_3NxdnN0Xloq6Ksq2lWXNtKGy5Q0TzoGpWsOsI1wAsxSIaazlxgohNKmNbChzppJGCFtxyfbQ8XruKobXKV-lep8sdJ0eIExJMVqRmlWc8YyertFsL6UIrVpF3-fDFSXqU69aqr961adetdabw4dfeybTg_uJfvvMwOUagPztm4eokvUwWHA-gh2VC_4_ez4AxC-TMQ</recordid><startdate>202503</startdate><enddate>202503</enddate><creator>Wei, Zhao</creator><creator>Khan, Muhammad Tahir</creator><creator>Zhiyu, Feng</creator><creator>Min, Wang</creator><creator>Hong, Zhang</creator><creator>Yuan, Yuan</creator><creator>Di, Wu</creator><creator>Zeying, Chen</creator><creator>Xianlin, Huang</creator><creator>Yaoju, Tan</creator><creator>Haobin, Kuang</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1158-2133</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202503</creationdate><title>Diagnostic value of SAT-TB in stool and urine samples for intestinal and urinary tuberculosis</title><author>Wei, Zhao ; Khan, Muhammad Tahir ; Zhiyu, Feng ; Min, Wang ; Hong, Zhang ; Yuan, Yuan ; Di, Wu ; Zeying, Chen ; Xianlin, Huang ; Yaoju, Tan ; Haobin, Kuang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1685-2ff7283ab17f4936ddeb5fb3cd046e3c1e0b9cc4bc666a08b7913db57b66c5473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Intestinal tuberculosis</topic><topic>SAT</topic><topic>SAT-TB</topic><topic>Urinary tuberculosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wei, Zhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Muhammad Tahir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhiyu, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min, Wang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Zhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di, Wu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeying, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xianlin, Huang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaoju, Tan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haobin, Kuang</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wei, Zhao</au><au>Khan, Muhammad Tahir</au><au>Zhiyu, Feng</au><au>Min, Wang</au><au>Hong, Zhang</au><au>Yuan, Yuan</au><au>Di, Wu</au><au>Zeying, Chen</au><au>Xianlin, Huang</au><au>Yaoju, Tan</au><au>Haobin, Kuang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic value of SAT-TB in stool and urine samples for intestinal and urinary tuberculosis</atitle><jtitle>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease</jtitle><addtitle>Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2025-03</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>116672</spage><pages>116672-</pages><artnum>116672</artnum><issn>0732-8893</issn><issn>1879-0070</issn><eissn>1879-0070</eissn><abstract>•Sensitivity and specificity for stool samples: 53.33 %, 93.88 % (SAT-TB), 60 %, 81.63 % (Xpert).•SAT-TB and Xpert showed moderate consistency with clinical diagnosis (Kappa: 0.48, 0.42).•SAT-TB sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for urine samples: 27.27 %, 98.28 %, 0.628.•Combining SAT-TB, Xpert, and MGIT960 culture improved diagnostic efficacy for stool samples (AUC: 0.823).•SAT-TB had the lowest diagnostic efficacy for urine samples; combined methods increased AUC. The simultaneous amplification/testing for tuberculosis (SAT-TB) targets specific 16s rRNA for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis in real-time. To evaluate SAT-TB's performance in detecting intestinal and urinary TB using stool and urine samples. Stool (94) and urine samples (69) (From 2021 to 2022), were collected from pulmonary combined with suspected intestinal or urinary tuberculosis. Simultaneous detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis was performed using the SAT-TB method, Xpert MTB/RIF assay, and MGIT960 culture. For stool samples, the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were 53.33 %, 93.88 %, and 0.736 for SAT-TB; 60 %, 81.63 %, and 0.708 for Xpert; and 40 %, 95.92 %, and 0.680 for MGIT960. For urine samples, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for SAT-TB, Xpert, and MGIT960 were 27.27 %, 98.28 %, 0.628; 54.55 %, 96.35 %, 0.755; and 45.45 %, 100 %, 0.727, respectively. ROC analysis indicated that SAT-TB had the highest diagnostic efficacy for stool samples when tested individually.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39742705</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116672</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1158-2133</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0732-8893
ispartof Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 2025-03, Vol.111 (3), p.116672, Article 116672
issn 0732-8893
1879-0070
1879-0070
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3150835434
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Intestinal tuberculosis
SAT
SAT-TB
Urinary tuberculosis
title Diagnostic value of SAT-TB in stool and urine samples for intestinal and urinary tuberculosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T04%3A26%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20value%20of%20SAT-TB%20in%20stool%20and%20urine%20samples%20for%20intestinal%20and%20urinary%20tuberculosis&rft.jtitle=Diagnostic%20microbiology%20and%20infectious%20disease&rft.au=Wei,%20Zhao&rft.date=2025-03&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=116672&rft.pages=116672-&rft.artnum=116672&rft.issn=0732-8893&rft.eissn=1879-0070&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116672&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3150835434%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3150835434&rft_id=info:pmid/39742705&rft_els_id=S0732889324004966&rfr_iscdi=true