Prediction of the need of enteral nutrition during radiation therapy for head and neck cancers
•Radiation induce toxicities may reduce oral intake and indicate enteral nutrition.•An explainable model was developed to predict the need for enteral nutrition.•The predictive performances were reported on an external multicentric real world cohort.•For each patient, the impact of each variable on...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiotherapy and oncology 2024-12, Vol.203, p.110693, Article 110693 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Radiation induce toxicities may reduce oral intake and indicate enteral nutrition.•An explainable model was developed to predict the need for enteral nutrition.•The predictive performances were reported on an external multicentric real world cohort.•For each patient, the impact of each variable on the model’s output could be displayed.
Patients with a head and neck (HN) cancer undergoing radiotherapy risk critical weight loss and oral intake reduction leading to enteral nutrition. We developed a predictive model for the need for enteral nutrition during radiotherapy in this setting. Its performances were reported on a real-world multicentric cohort.
Two models were trained on a prospective monocentric cohort of 230 patients. The first model predicted an outcome combining severe or early fast weight loss, or severe oral intake impairment (grade 3 anorexia or dysphagia or the prescription of enteral nutrition). The second outcome only combined oral intake impairment criteria. We trained a gradient boosted tree with a nested cross validation for Bayesian optimization on a prospective cohort and predictive performances were reported on the external multicentric real-world cohort of 410 patients from 3 centres. Predictions were explainable for each patient using Shapley values.
For the first and second outcome, the model yielded a ROC curve AUC of 81 % and 80%, an accuracy of 77 % and 77 %, a positive predictive value of 77 % and 72 %, a specificity of 78 % and 79 % and a sensitivity of 75 % and 73 %. The negative predictive value was 80 % and 80 %. For each patient, the underlying Shapley values of each clinical predictor to the prediction could be displayed. Overall, the most contributing predictor was concomitant chemotherapy.
Our predictive model yielded good performance on a real life multicentric validation cohort to predict the need for enteral nutrition during radiotherapy for HN cancers. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-8140 1879-0887 1879-0887 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110693 |