Machine Learning-Driven Identification of Distinct Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Phenotypes: A Cluster Analysis of DECAAF II

Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation yields sub-optimal success rates partly due to the considerable heterogeneity within the patient population. Identifying distinct patient phenotypes based on post-ablation prognosis could improve patient selection for additional therapies and optim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology 2024-12
Hauptverfasser: Noujaim, Charbel, Feng, Han, Bidaoui, Ghassan, Huang, Chao, Younes, Hadi, Assaf, Ala, Mekhael, Mario, Chouman, Nour, Lim, Chanho, Donnellan, Eoin, Shamaileh, Ghaith, El Hajjar, Abdel Hadi, Nelson, Daniel, Dhore, Aneesh, Li, Dan, Marrouche, Nassir, Kreidieh, Omar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation yields sub-optimal success rates partly due to the considerable heterogeneity within the patient population. Identifying distinct patient phenotypes based on post-ablation prognosis could improve patient selection for additional therapies and optimize treatment strategies. We studied all patients who underwent catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation in the DECAAF II trial. Out of 44 participating centers, 25% were randomly chosen as a validation set. A Gradient Boosting Method determined essential features for arrhythmia recurrence prediction and the number of clusters was determined according to the average silhouette width. K-medoids cluster analysis identified subgroups based on these features, and Kaplan-Meier curves were further compared among different clusters. Among 815 patients, 570 served as a training set and 245 as a validation set. Using the training set, the GBM model achieved an AUC of 0.874. K-medoids cluster analysis used LA volume, BMI, baseline fibrosis, and age, resulting in two clusters. Cluster 1 patients were older, had higher baseline fibrosis, higher BMI, and greater LA volume compared to Cluster 2. Atrial arrhythmia recurrence rates were significantly higher in Cluster 1 (51.7% vs. 35.0%, p = 0.0002), and survival analysis showed a significant difference in primary recurrence outcomes (HR = 1.71, p 
ISSN:1045-3873
1540-8167
1540-8167
DOI:10.1111/jce.16554