The role of Intravitreal chemotherapy as an adjunctive treatment for retinoblastoma: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis
evaluation of clinical outcomes of patients with retinoblastoma treated with intravitreal chemotherapy (IvitC). Systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinical outcomes with IVitC vary across reports according to patient characteristics and concomitant treatment modalitie...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of ophthalmology 2024-12 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | evaluation of clinical outcomes of patients with retinoblastoma treated with intravitreal chemotherapy (IvitC).
Systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinical outcomes with IVitC vary across reports according to patient characteristics and concomitant treatment modalities, mainly intravenous chemotherapy (IVC) and intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC). There are currently no large clinical trials or meta-analyses focusing on the topic.
A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane. All articles reporting use of IVitC for RB and safety or efficacy outcomes were included regardless of publication date. Studies with fewer than 10 eyes were excluded. Enucleation rates (ER) were calculated using proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The analysis was performed using the Random Effects model in R Studio.
25 studies comprising 1082 eyes met inclusion criteria. Melphalan was exclusively used in 687 eyes (63.49%), 104 eyes received topotecan exclusively (9.61%), and the remaining 291 (26.90%) used a combination. General ER was 24.70% (95% CI 19.20-31.18%). Subgroup analysis showed an ER of 27.76% (95% CI 19.05-38.55%) for melphalan, 14.23% (95% CI 5.61-21.66%) for topotecan, and 23.82% (95% CI 11.95-41.87%) for combination therapy (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1879-1891 1879-1891 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.12.012 |