Advancing 3D dental scanning: The use of photogrammetry with light detection and ranging for edentulous arches
The advent of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) has necessitated the acquisition of digital scans. However, there are limitations and problems with acquiring accurate 3-dimensional (3D) casts from edentulous patients, especially in the presence of saliva. The purpose o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2024-12 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The advent of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) has necessitated the acquisition of digital scans. However, there are limitations and problems with acquiring accurate 3-dimensional (3D) casts from edentulous patients, especially in the presence of saliva.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to develop a novel approach for obtaining 3D casts of edentulous arches by using 2-dimensional (2D) images as an alternative to traditional 3D scanners with and without light detection and ranging (LiDAR).
This study comprised 6 groups, each consisting of 10 specimens. For the control group, 3D casts were generated by scanning edentulous mandibular molds using a dental laboratory scanner. Experimental groups included photogrammetry with and without LiDAR under various conditions (Groups PG360, PG120, LPG120, PG360S, LPG120S). For Groups PG120, LPG120, and LPG120S, a custom-made manikin was used. In all photogrammetry groups, images of each mold were captured with a mobile phone (iPhone 14 Pro Max). The casts from the experimental groups were superimposed onto those from the control group using the Blender Foundation software program (Version 3.6.1). The mean distances were calculated and statistically analyzed using 1-way ANOVA followed by the post hoc Tukey test (α=.05).
The mean distances between the experimental groups and the control group varied significantly. The PG360 and PG120 groups showed a statistically significant difference from the control group (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3913 1097-6841 1097-6841 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.032 |