The impact of white matter hyperintensities on short-term outcomes of reperfusion therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke

Background and purpose This study aimed to explore the impact of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) on the short-term outcomes of reperfusion therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. Methods We prospectively collected data on AIS patients undergoing reperfusion therapies at Chengdu Second P...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurology 2025, Vol.272 (1), p.81
Hauptverfasser: Li, Junying, Yang, Dan, Song, Rui, Wang, Jian, He, Lanying
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and purpose This study aimed to explore the impact of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) on the short-term outcomes of reperfusion therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. Methods We prospectively collected data on AIS patients undergoing reperfusion therapies at Chengdu Second People’s Hospital from January 2020 and January 2024. WMH severity was graded as 0–3 (none to moderate) or 4–6 (severe) by the Fazekas scale. We analyzed National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, good functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale, mRS 0–2) at 7 days and discharge, and safety outcomes like in-hospital mortality and intracranial hemorrhage. Results During the study period, 669 patients were included, with 345 having none to moderate WMH and 324 with severe WMH. Patients with severe WMH exhibited significantly higher NIHSS and mRS at 7 days and discharge, with a decrease in good outcomes (mRS 0–2: 40.43% vs. 75.65%), and an increase in intracranial hemorrhage (16.4% vs. 5.8%) and in-hospital mortality (11.7% vs. 2.0%) compared with none to moderate WMH patients. After matching the baseline data, none to moderate WMH was associated with higher likelihood of good outcomes at discharge [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.142; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.380–3.304; P  
ISSN:0340-5354
1432-1459
1432-1459
DOI:10.1007/s00415-024-12755-w