Impact of Arch Disease Pathology on Outcomes of Zone 0 Branched Thoracic Endovascular Arch Repair

Zone 0 branched thoracic endovascular arch repair (Z0BTEVAR) has emerged as an alternative to open repair for high-risk patients with aortic arch pathology. However, it is unclear how disease characteristics in this population impacts clinical outcomes. The study aimed to compare Z0BTEVAR according...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of vascular surgery 2024-12
Hauptverfasser: Guo, Ming Hao, Kölbel, Tilo, Le Houerou, Thomas, Mesnard, Thomas, Sobocinski, Jonathan, Nana, Petroula, Haulon, Stéphan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Zone 0 branched thoracic endovascular arch repair (Z0BTEVAR) has emerged as an alternative to open repair for high-risk patients with aortic arch pathology. However, it is unclear how disease characteristics in this population impacts clinical outcomes. The study aimed to compare Z0BTEVAR according to arch disease pathology and to identify potential predictors of post-operative outcomes. From 2011 to 2023, patients who underwent Z0BTEVAR for chronic aortic dissection (C-AD) or for non-aortic dissection (N-AD) etiology at 3 European centers were included. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality and disabling stroke. Multivariable logistic analyses were conducted to identify independent predictors of the outcomes. Overall, 213 patients underwent Z0BTEVAR, including 111 patients treated for C-AD and 102 patients treated for N-AD. The median age was 72 years old. Overall composite outcome was 10.3%, higher for N-AD patients compared to C-AD patients (15.7% vs. 5.4%; p=0.01). Similarly, N-AD patients had more post-operative strokes (17.7% vs. 4.5%; p
ISSN:1097-6809
1097-6809
DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.11.039