Clinical Value of Nomograms Integrating Circulating Lipid and Inflammation Risk Score in Predicting Long-Term Outcomes After Radical Gastrectomy in Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Real-World Study

The clinical value of incorporating lipid and inflammatory factors to predict long-term survival in patients with gastric cancer (GC) is unreported. This study aimed to investigate the clinical value of nomograms integrating the Circulating Lipid and Inflammation Risk Score (CLIRS) for predicting th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2024-12
Hauptverfasser: Hu, Minggao, Zheng, Hualong, Zheng, Honghong, Xu, Binbin, Wei, Linghua, Xue, Zhen, Shen, Lili, Yu, Junhua, Xie, Rongzhen, Lin, Jia, Zhang, Lingkang, Zheng, Zhiwei, Xie, Jianwei, Zheng, Chaohui, Huang, Changming, Wang, Jiabin, Li, Ping
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The clinical value of incorporating lipid and inflammatory factors to predict long-term survival in patients with gastric cancer (GC) is unreported. This study aimed to investigate the clinical value of nomograms integrating the Circulating Lipid and Inflammation Risk Score (CLIRS) for predicting the long-term outcome of patients with GC. A retrospective analysis included patients with GC who underwent radical resection at four tertiary medical centers. Patients were divided into training and validation cohorts, with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression selecting optimal lipid and inflammatory indicators related to GC prognosis. The CLIRS was developed from six indicators: lymphocyte, triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B. Overall, 2534 patients were studied, including 1910 in the training cohort and 624 in the validation cohort. The CLIRS was an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR] 1.529, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.271-1.839; p 
ISSN:1534-4681
1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-024-16687-7