Anterior Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Lower Extremity Revascularization

Regional anesthesia remains underutilized in vascular surgery; therefore, we retrospectively reviewed and compared the usage of perioperative opioids in patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization surgery, who received the anterior transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block along with local a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of surgical research 2024-12, Vol.305, p.93-99
Hauptverfasser: Gurrieri, Carmelina, Almhanni, Ghaith, Sen, Indrani, Beckermann, Jason, Carmody, Thomas, Tallarita, Tiziano
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Regional anesthesia remains underutilized in vascular surgery; therefore, we retrospectively reviewed and compared the usage of perioperative opioids in patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization surgery, who received the anterior transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block along with local anesthesia at the incision site versus who did not receive any regional anesthesia. We conducted a retrospective review of 107 patients undergoing open or hybrid lower extremity revascularization under general anesthesia at a single institution between 2017 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups. Regional block group (n = 41 [38%]) (femoral endarterectomy 27%; femoral endarterectomy + endovascular intervention 51%; infrainguinal bypass 22%) received both an intraoperative anterior TAP block and local anesthesia at the incision site; No regional block group (n = 66 [62%]) (femoral endarterectomy 29%; femoral endarterectomy + endovascular intervention 13%; infrainguinal bypass 58%) did not receive either regional or local anesthesia. There were no significant differences in either the procedural metrics or intraprocedural complications between the two groups. The in-hospital stay was shorter in the Regional group, 1 (1, 3) versus the No regional group, 3 (2, 7), P 
ISSN:0022-4804
1095-8673
1095-8673
DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2024.11.004