Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Bicuspid Aortic Valves

Recent approval of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients at lower risk profiles has resulted in a real-world expansion in patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAV), otherwise excluded from trials comparing TAVR with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). This study compared p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Annals of thoracic surgery 2024-12
Hauptverfasser: Mehaffey, J. Hunter, Jagadeesan, Vikrant, Kawsara, Mohammad, Hayanga, J.W. Awori, Chauhan, Dhaval, Wei, Lawrence, Mascio, Christopher E., Rankin, J. Scott, Daggubati, Ramesh, Badhwar, Vinay
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Recent approval of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients at lower risk profiles has resulted in a real-world expansion in patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAV), otherwise excluded from trials comparing TAVR with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). This study compared perioperative and longitudinal outcomes between BAV patients undergoing TAVR vs SAVR. Using the United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services inpatient claims database, we evaluated all beneficiaries with BAV undergoing isolated SAVR or TAVR (2018-2022). Comorbidities and frailty were accounted for using validated metrics with doubly robust risk adjustment using inverse probability weighting, multilevel regression models, and competing-risk time to event analysis. Subgroup analysis evaluated patients
ISSN:0003-4975
1552-6259
1552-6259
DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.11.023