Comparison of safety and immunogenicity in the elderly after receiving either Comirnaty or Spikevax monovalent XBB1.5 COVID-19 vaccine
The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants necessitates ongoing evaluation of vaccine performance. This study evaluates and compares the safety and immunogenicity of the Comirnaty and Spikevax monovalent XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccines in an elderly population. Altogether, 129 elderly individuals were recruited...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of infection 2025-01, Vol.90 (1), p.106374, Article 106374 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants necessitates ongoing evaluation of vaccine performance. This study evaluates and compares the safety and immunogenicity of the Comirnaty and Spikevax monovalent XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccines in an elderly population.
Altogether, 129 elderly individuals were recruited between 2 January and 3 February 2024, and received a booster dose of either Comirnaty (n=59) or Spikevax (n=70) monovalent XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccine. Blood samples were collected at before and one month after vaccination. Immunogenicity was assessed by measuring the percentage of IFNγ+CD4+ and IFNγ+CD8+ T cells, and neutralizing antibody titers (NT50) using a surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT). Adverse reactions were recorded and analyzed.
Both vaccines significantly increased the percentage of IFNγ+CD8+ T cells against XBB.1.5 and wild-type (WT) SARS-CoV-2 at one-month post-vaccination. Spikevax induced a significantly higher percentages of IFNγ+CD8+ and CD4+ T cells against XBB.1.5 than Comirnaty (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0163-4453 1532-2742 1532-2742 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106374 |