Comparison of safety and immunogenicity in the elderly after receiving either Comirnaty or Spikevax monovalent XBB1.5 COVID-19 vaccine

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants necessitates ongoing evaluation of vaccine performance. This study evaluates and compares the safety and immunogenicity of the Comirnaty and Spikevax monovalent XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccines in an elderly population. Altogether, 129 elderly individuals were recruited...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of infection 2025-01, Vol.90 (1), p.106374, Article 106374
Hauptverfasser: Mok, Chris Ka Pun, Tang, Yun Sang, Tan, Chee Wah, Chong, Ka Chun, Chen, Chunke, Sun, Yuanxin, Yiu, Karen, Ling, Kwun Cheung, Chan, Ken KP, Hui, David S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants necessitates ongoing evaluation of vaccine performance. This study evaluates and compares the safety and immunogenicity of the Comirnaty and Spikevax monovalent XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccines in an elderly population. Altogether, 129 elderly individuals were recruited between 2 January and 3 February 2024, and received a booster dose of either Comirnaty (n=59) or Spikevax (n=70) monovalent XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccine. Blood samples were collected at before and one month after vaccination. Immunogenicity was assessed by measuring the percentage of IFNγ+CD4+ and IFNγ+CD8+ T cells, and neutralizing antibody titers (NT50) using a surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT). Adverse reactions were recorded and analyzed. Both vaccines significantly increased the percentage of IFNγ+CD8+ T cells against XBB.1.5 and wild-type (WT) SARS-CoV-2 at one-month post-vaccination. Spikevax induced a significantly higher percentages of IFNγ+CD8+ and CD4+ T cells against XBB.1.5 than Comirnaty (p
ISSN:0163-4453
1532-2742
1532-2742
DOI:10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106374