Comparison of suction technique and non-suction technique in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparison of suction technique and non-suction technique in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery (RIRS) using the vacuum suction technique for the treatment of upper urinary calculi. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Sino Med, CNKI, WANFANG DATA, and Cochra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International urology and nephrology 2024-12
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Pengan, Mi, Gaoshen, Chen, Jixiang, Liu, Yu, Jian, Zhongyu, Jin, Xi, Wang, Kunjie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title International urology and nephrology
container_volume
creator Chen, Pengan
Mi, Gaoshen
Chen, Jixiang
Liu, Yu
Jian, Zhongyu
Jin, Xi
Wang, Kunjie
description To evaluate the clinical efficacy of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery (RIRS) using the vacuum suction technique for the treatment of upper urinary calculi. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Sino Med, CNKI, WANFANG DATA, and Cochrane. We included studies comparing vacuum suction RIRS with non-vacuum RIRS. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we performed a meta-analysis of the selected studies. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control studies, and retrospective studies evaluating the efficacy of these techniques. Key outcomes analyzed included operative time, hospitalization duration, stone-free rates, and complication rates. Statistical analyses were conducted using mean differences (MD) for continuous variables and odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous outcomes, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sixteen studies (6 RCTs, 1 case-control study, and 9 retrospective studies) involving a total of 2029 patients were included. Meta-analysis revealed that the vacuum suction technique significantly reduced operative time (MD = - 14.45 min, 95% CI [- 18.45; - 10.44], P 
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11255-024-04280-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146609993</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3146609993</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-47d5e7db4a08493403a041b9b7cf9a1eb0820be4028d83eea0dafeb7979bdc8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkctOHDEQRa0oUXgkP8AC9TIbQ_nR3XZ2aEQSJCQ2ydqqblcTR9P2xPaA5gvy22kYQEis6paq7pGqLmMnAs4EQH9ehJBty0FqDloa4N07dijaXnHZGv3-lT5gR6X8AQBrAD6yA2W7ttNgDtm_VZo3mENJsUlTU7ZjDYusNP6O4e-WGoy-iSnyt5MQm0w1p9uM_qGrGTNFXDelpkgLKt9S3n1tsCm7UmnGGsbFcRfo_pE6U0WOi2FXQvnEPky4LvT5qR6zX98uf65-8Oub71eri2s-Smkq171vqfeDRjDaKg0KQYvBDv04WRQ0gJEwkAZpvFFECB4nGnrb28GPxqtj9mXP3eS0HFGqm0MZab3GSGlbnBK668Baq5ZVuV8dcyol0-Q2OcyYd06AewjA7QNwSwDuMQDXLabTJ_52mMm_WJ4_rv4DLMWFHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3146609993</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of suction technique and non-suction technique in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Chen, Pengan ; Mi, Gaoshen ; Chen, Jixiang ; Liu, Yu ; Jian, Zhongyu ; Jin, Xi ; Wang, Kunjie</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Pengan ; Mi, Gaoshen ; Chen, Jixiang ; Liu, Yu ; Jian, Zhongyu ; Jin, Xi ; Wang, Kunjie</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the clinical efficacy of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery (RIRS) using the vacuum suction technique for the treatment of upper urinary calculi. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Sino Med, CNKI, WANFANG DATA, and Cochrane. We included studies comparing vacuum suction RIRS with non-vacuum RIRS. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we performed a meta-analysis of the selected studies. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control studies, and retrospective studies evaluating the efficacy of these techniques. Key outcomes analyzed included operative time, hospitalization duration, stone-free rates, and complication rates. Statistical analyses were conducted using mean differences (MD) for continuous variables and odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous outcomes, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sixteen studies (6 RCTs, 1 case-control study, and 9 retrospective studies) involving a total of 2029 patients were included. Meta-analysis revealed that the vacuum suction technique significantly reduced operative time (MD = - 14.45 min, 95% CI [- 18.45; - 10.44], P &lt; 0.00001) and hospital stay (MD = - 0.54 days, 95% CI [- 0.80; - 0.28], P &lt; 0.00001). In addition, patients in the vacuum suction group had a higher stone-free rate (OR = 3.57, 95% CI [2.57; 4.95], P &lt; 0.00001) and lower complication rates, particularly in reducing postoperative fever. The application of the vacuum suction technique in RIRS significantly improves clinical outcomes by reducing operative time and hospitalization duration, enhancing stone-free rates, and lowering postoperative complication rates. This technique demonstrates a clear clinical advantage over non-vacuum RIRS and should be considered a preferred option for the management of upper urinary tract stones.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1573-2584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11255-024-04280-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39656408</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands</publisher><ispartof>International urology and nephrology, 2024-12</ispartof><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-47d5e7db4a08493403a041b9b7cf9a1eb0820be4028d83eea0dafeb7979bdc8d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39656408$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Pengan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mi, Gaoshen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jixiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jian, Zhongyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kunjie</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of suction technique and non-suction technique in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>International urology and nephrology</title><addtitle>Int Urol Nephrol</addtitle><description>To evaluate the clinical efficacy of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery (RIRS) using the vacuum suction technique for the treatment of upper urinary calculi. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Sino Med, CNKI, WANFANG DATA, and Cochrane. We included studies comparing vacuum suction RIRS with non-vacuum RIRS. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we performed a meta-analysis of the selected studies. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control studies, and retrospective studies evaluating the efficacy of these techniques. Key outcomes analyzed included operative time, hospitalization duration, stone-free rates, and complication rates. Statistical analyses were conducted using mean differences (MD) for continuous variables and odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous outcomes, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sixteen studies (6 RCTs, 1 case-control study, and 9 retrospective studies) involving a total of 2029 patients were included. Meta-analysis revealed that the vacuum suction technique significantly reduced operative time (MD = - 14.45 min, 95% CI [- 18.45; - 10.44], P &lt; 0.00001) and hospital stay (MD = - 0.54 days, 95% CI [- 0.80; - 0.28], P &lt; 0.00001). In addition, patients in the vacuum suction group had a higher stone-free rate (OR = 3.57, 95% CI [2.57; 4.95], P &lt; 0.00001) and lower complication rates, particularly in reducing postoperative fever. The application of the vacuum suction technique in RIRS significantly improves clinical outcomes by reducing operative time and hospitalization duration, enhancing stone-free rates, and lowering postoperative complication rates. This technique demonstrates a clear clinical advantage over non-vacuum RIRS and should be considered a preferred option for the management of upper urinary tract stones.</description><issn>1573-2584</issn><issn>1573-2584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkctOHDEQRa0oUXgkP8AC9TIbQ_nR3XZ2aEQSJCQ2ydqqblcTR9P2xPaA5gvy22kYQEis6paq7pGqLmMnAs4EQH9ehJBty0FqDloa4N07dijaXnHZGv3-lT5gR6X8AQBrAD6yA2W7ttNgDtm_VZo3mENJsUlTU7ZjDYusNP6O4e-WGoy-iSnyt5MQm0w1p9uM_qGrGTNFXDelpkgLKt9S3n1tsCm7UmnGGsbFcRfo_pE6U0WOi2FXQvnEPky4LvT5qR6zX98uf65-8Oub71eri2s-Smkq171vqfeDRjDaKg0KQYvBDv04WRQ0gJEwkAZpvFFECB4nGnrb28GPxqtj9mXP3eS0HFGqm0MZab3GSGlbnBK668Baq5ZVuV8dcyol0-Q2OcyYd06AewjA7QNwSwDuMQDXLabTJ_52mMm_WJ4_rv4DLMWFHQ</recordid><startdate>20241210</startdate><enddate>20241210</enddate><creator>Chen, Pengan</creator><creator>Mi, Gaoshen</creator><creator>Chen, Jixiang</creator><creator>Liu, Yu</creator><creator>Jian, Zhongyu</creator><creator>Jin, Xi</creator><creator>Wang, Kunjie</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241210</creationdate><title>Comparison of suction technique and non-suction technique in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Chen, Pengan ; Mi, Gaoshen ; Chen, Jixiang ; Liu, Yu ; Jian, Zhongyu ; Jin, Xi ; Wang, Kunjie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-47d5e7db4a08493403a041b9b7cf9a1eb0820be4028d83eea0dafeb7979bdc8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Pengan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mi, Gaoshen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jixiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jian, Zhongyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kunjie</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International urology and nephrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Pengan</au><au>Mi, Gaoshen</au><au>Chen, Jixiang</au><au>Liu, Yu</au><au>Jian, Zhongyu</au><au>Jin, Xi</au><au>Wang, Kunjie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of suction technique and non-suction technique in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>International urology and nephrology</jtitle><addtitle>Int Urol Nephrol</addtitle><date>2024-12-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>1573-2584</issn><eissn>1573-2584</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the clinical efficacy of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery (RIRS) using the vacuum suction technique for the treatment of upper urinary calculi. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Sino Med, CNKI, WANFANG DATA, and Cochrane. We included studies comparing vacuum suction RIRS with non-vacuum RIRS. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we performed a meta-analysis of the selected studies. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control studies, and retrospective studies evaluating the efficacy of these techniques. Key outcomes analyzed included operative time, hospitalization duration, stone-free rates, and complication rates. Statistical analyses were conducted using mean differences (MD) for continuous variables and odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous outcomes, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sixteen studies (6 RCTs, 1 case-control study, and 9 retrospective studies) involving a total of 2029 patients were included. Meta-analysis revealed that the vacuum suction technique significantly reduced operative time (MD = - 14.45 min, 95% CI [- 18.45; - 10.44], P &lt; 0.00001) and hospital stay (MD = - 0.54 days, 95% CI [- 0.80; - 0.28], P &lt; 0.00001). In addition, patients in the vacuum suction group had a higher stone-free rate (OR = 3.57, 95% CI [2.57; 4.95], P &lt; 0.00001) and lower complication rates, particularly in reducing postoperative fever. The application of the vacuum suction technique in RIRS significantly improves clinical outcomes by reducing operative time and hospitalization duration, enhancing stone-free rates, and lowering postoperative complication rates. This technique demonstrates a clear clinical advantage over non-vacuum RIRS and should be considered a preferred option for the management of upper urinary tract stones.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pmid>39656408</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11255-024-04280-6</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1573-2584
ispartof International urology and nephrology, 2024-12
issn 1573-2584
1573-2584
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146609993
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
title Comparison of suction technique and non-suction technique in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T09%3A43%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20suction%20technique%20and%20non-suction%20technique%20in%20retrograde%20intrarenal%20stone%20surgery:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=International%20urology%20and%20nephrology&rft.au=Chen,%20Pengan&rft.date=2024-12-10&rft.issn=1573-2584&rft.eissn=1573-2584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11255-024-04280-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3146609993%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3146609993&rft_id=info:pmid/39656408&rfr_iscdi=true