Comparison of suction technique and non-suction technique in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
To evaluate the clinical efficacy of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery (RIRS) using the vacuum suction technique for the treatment of upper urinary calculi. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Sino Med, CNKI, WANFANG DATA, and Cochra...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International urology and nephrology 2024-12 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To evaluate the clinical efficacy of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery (RIRS) using the vacuum suction technique for the treatment of upper urinary calculi.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Sino Med, CNKI, WANFANG DATA, and Cochrane. We included studies comparing vacuum suction RIRS with non-vacuum RIRS. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we performed a meta-analysis of the selected studies. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control studies, and retrospective studies evaluating the efficacy of these techniques. Key outcomes analyzed included operative time, hospitalization duration, stone-free rates, and complication rates. Statistical analyses were conducted using mean differences (MD) for continuous variables and odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous outcomes, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Sixteen studies (6 RCTs, 1 case-control study, and 9 retrospective studies) involving a total of 2029 patients were included. Meta-analysis revealed that the vacuum suction technique significantly reduced operative time (MD = - 14.45 min, 95% CI [- 18.45; - 10.44], P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1573-2584 1573-2584 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11255-024-04280-6 |