Patient Preferences with Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema: A Multinational Discrete Choice Experiment Study

Introduction: New anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatments are emerging for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME)/neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). This study aimed to explore the treatment attributes patients find important when deciding on treatment opti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmic research 2024-11, p.1-17
Hauptverfasser: García-Layana, Alfredo, Chi, Gloria C., Kodjikian, Laurent, Parravano, Mariacristina, Chow, David, Jackson, Timothy L., Danzig, Carl, Paris, Liliana P., Mirt, Mirela, Henry-Szatkowski, Mickael, Lewis, Hannah B., Gentile, Brittany
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction: New anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatments are emerging for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME)/neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). This study aimed to explore the treatment attributes patients find important when deciding on treatment options. Methods: This noninterventional survey study assessed treatment preferences through a discrete choice experiment (DCE) among patients with DME/nAMD in the United States, Canada, France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom. The DCE design was informed by a targeted literature review and qualitative interview research and included five treatment attributes: mode of administration, frequency of examinations, frequency of injections or refills, likely change in visual acuity, and eye-related side effects. Conditional logit models were used to analyze the choice data. Results: Overall, 537 patients completed the DCE (DME, n = 173; nAMD, n = 364). Patients reported preferring “injection” over “implant surgery and refills” and better visual outcomes over “stabilization”, which were also the most important attributes driving preference (35.1% and 31.5%, respectively). They also showed a preference for less-frequent treatment and examinations and for “mild-moderate, frequent” over “severe, rare” side effects. These findings were generally consistent across the two conditions, although significant differences were found depending on anti-VEGF treatment duration (nAMD, DME) and number of reported barriers (nAMD). Conclusion: Patient preferences for treatment are driven by several factors. Considering these is essential when designing/introducing new therapies. Individual treatment preferences should be identified and given key consideration when helping patients select from an expanding array of treatment options.
ISSN:0030-3747
1423-0259
1423-0259
DOI:10.1159/000541349