The prognostic value of pretreatment 18FFDG PET/CT parameters in esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis

This study aims to evaluate the prognostic implications of pretreatment [18F]FDG-PET metrics in esophageal cancer patients through a meta-analysis of the existing literature.OBJECTIVESThis study aims to evaluate the prognostic implications of pretreatment [18F]FDG-PET metrics in esophageal cancer patients through a meta-analysis of the existing literature.We carefully searched electronic databases, including PubMed and Embase, from inception to April 1, 2024, to identify studies describing the prognostic value of pretreatment PET metrics for advanced esophageal cancer. Clinical endpoints examined were overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS)/disease-free survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and OS were taken directly from the original reports.METHODSWe carefully searched electronic databases, including PubMed and Embase, from inception to April 1, 2024, to identify studies describing the prognostic value of pretreatment PET metrics for advanced esophageal cancer. Clinical endpoints examined were overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS)/disease-free survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and OS were taken directly from the original reports.Forty-seven publications, including 5504 patients, were included in our analysis. OS and PFS were analyzed in 31 and nine studies, respectively, and DFS/RFS was analyzed in 16 studies. The comprehensive pooled analysis revealed significant associations between metabolic parameters derived from positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and clinical outcomes. Expressly, the pooled HR indicated that patients with higher SUVmax were significantly associated with poor PFS (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.12, p = 0.011) and poor RFS/DFS (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02-1.18, p = 0.019). Patients with higher SUVmean were significantly associated with poorer OS (HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.01-1.14, p = 0.025). High MTV was significantly associated with inferior OS (HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00-1.05, p = 0.049). High TLG was significantly associated with poorer RFS/DFS (HR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.11-3.68, p = 0.022).RESULTSForty-seven publications, including 5504 patients, were included in our analysis. OS and PFS were analyzed in 31 and nine studies, respectively, and DFS/RFS was analyzed in 16 studies. The comprehensive pooled analysis revealed significant associations between metabolic parameters derived from positron emission tomography (PET) imaging a