Multi-ethnic heterozygote frequencies of cancer susceptibility genes to inform counseling of reproductive risk
Pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in a subset of cancer predisposition genes (CPGs) are associated with adult-onset autosomal dominant (AD) cancer susceptibility and life-limiting autosomal recessive (AR) disease. Counseling in adult cancer genetics clinics regarding reproductive risk for PGV hete...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Genetics in medicine 2025-01, Vol.27 (1), p.101246, Article 101246 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in a subset of cancer predisposition genes (CPGs) are associated with adult-onset autosomal dominant (AD) cancer susceptibility and life-limiting autosomal recessive (AR) disease. Counseling in adult cancer genetics clinics regarding reproductive risk for PGV heterozygotes is limited.
Estimated heterozygote frequencies across ancestries were calculated for AD CPGs with AR risk (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, FH, NBN, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, RAD51C, SDHA, SDHB, and SDHD) from gnomADv.3.0, the Penn Medicine Biobank, and FLOSSIES.
Average frequencies of heterozygotes with PGVs across ancestries for BRCA1 and BRCA2 were 0.33% ± 0.41% and 0.43% ± 0.36%, with variability cross-ancestry from 0.06% to 1.32% and 0.17% to 1.29%, respectively. ATM had the next highest PGV heterozygote frequency (0.31% ± 0.12%) and SDHD the lowest (0.01% ± 0.01%) average PGV heterozygote frequency. Heterozygote PGV frequencies from gnomAD were similar as cancer-free individuals in Penn Medicine Biobank and higher than in the FLOSSIES data.
Heterozygote frequency estimates for AD CPGs that cause AR disease provides information to facilitate discussions regarding reproductive risk. Future studies are needed to assess whether utilization of these data will influence couples’ reproductive risk planning.
[Display omitted] |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1098-3600 1530-0366 1530-0366 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101246 |