Open versus minimally invasive hepatic and pancreatic surgery: 1-year costs, healthcare utilization and days of work lost

Utilization of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has become increasingly popular due to its potential benefits such as earlier recovery and reduced morbidity. We sought to characterize differences in 1-year healthcare costs and missed workdays among patients undergoing MIS and open surgery for a hepa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:HPB (Oxford, England) England), 2025-01, Vol.27 (1), p.111-122
Hauptverfasser: Khan, Muhammad M.M., Woldesenbet, Selamawit, Munir, Muhammad M., Khalil, Mujtaba, Endo, Yutaka, Katayama, Erryk, Tsilimigras, Diamantis, Rashid, Zayed, Altaf, Abdullah, Pawlik, Timothy M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Utilization of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has become increasingly popular due to its potential benefits such as earlier recovery and reduced morbidity. We sought to characterize differences in 1-year healthcare costs and missed workdays among patients undergoing MIS and open surgery for a hepatic or pancreatic indication. Data on patients who underwent hepatic and pancreatic resection were obtained from the IBM Marketscan database. Generalized linear models were utilized to compare healthcare costs and missed workdays among patients undergoing MIS versus open surgery. Among 8705 patients, 85.0 % (n = 7399) and 15.0 % (n = 1306) of patients underwent an open or MIS HP procedure, respectively. In the unmatched cohort, patients who underwent MIS were more likely to be female (62.7 % vs. 54.6 %) and were less likely to have a Charlson Comorbidity Index score >2 (34.5 % vs. 49.6 %) (both p 
ISSN:1365-182X
1477-2574
1477-2574
DOI:10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.017