Case Ascertainment in Pediatric Heart Failure Using International Classification of Disease Clinical Modification (ICD-CM) Codes
Most epidemiological studies in pediatric heart failure (HF) use administrative database sources, defining patient cohorts by presence of a single HF ICD code. However, the ability of ICD codes to identify true HF patients is unknown in pediatrics. Here we describe the accuracy of HF ICD-10-CM code...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pediatric cardiology 2024-11 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Most epidemiological studies in pediatric heart failure (HF) use administrative database sources, defining patient cohorts by presence of a single HF ICD code. However, the ability of ICD codes to identify true HF patients is unknown in pediatrics. Here we describe the accuracy of HF ICD-10-CM code search algorithms, in identifying pediatric patients with HF from electronic data sources. Based on the adult HF literature, search algorithms were designed to incorporate HF ICD codes, imaging, and medications. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and accuracy of the algorithms were tested among children in an advanced HF clinic ("Clinic cohort"). Top-performing algorithms were then tested in a large-scale regional electronic data warehouse (EDW), 01/2017 to 01/2020, generating the "EDW Cohort". False positive cases were identified and characterized by chart review. Within the Clinic Cohort, 78/378 patients (21%) had gold standard HF diagnoses. A search algorithm with one HF ICD coded visit was more sensitive but less specific than > 1 HF ICD coded visit, (sensitivity 94% and specificity 89% versus 69% and 97%, respectively). Correspondingly, > 1 ICD coded visit had a higher PPV than one ICD coded visit; 84% vs. 69%. Accuracy was similar (90% vs 91%). Presence of 1 HF ICD code combined with HF medication had high sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy, all higher than the single ICD code algorithm. The "1 HF coded visit + any medication" algorithm resulted in highest accuracy (93%). Top-performing algorithms were tested in the EDW: the algorithm with > 1 HF ICD coded visit, and the algorithm with one HF ICD coded visit combined with HF medication. In the EDW Cohort, 133/248 (53.6%) patients had gold standard HF diagnoses though 115/248 (46.3%) were false positive cases; 41% of those had pulmonary over-circulation from congenital heart disease. Excluding children |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0172-0643 1432-1971 1432-1971 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00246-024-03698-0 |