Nosemosis negatively affects honeybee survival: experimental and meta-analytic evidence

Nosemosis, caused by microsporidian parasites of the genus , is considered a significant health concern for insect pollinators, including the economically important honeybee ( ). Despite its acknowledged importance, the impact of this disease on honeybee survivorship remains unclear. Here, a standar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Parasitology 2024-11, p.1-13
Hauptverfasser: Ostap-Chec, Monika, Cait, Jessica, Scott, R Wilder, Arct, Aneta, Moroń, Dawid, Rapacz, Marcin, Miler, Krzysztof
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Nosemosis, caused by microsporidian parasites of the genus , is considered a significant health concern for insect pollinators, including the economically important honeybee ( ). Despite its acknowledged importance, the impact of this disease on honeybee survivorship remains unclear. Here, a standard laboratory cage trial was used to compare mortality rates between healthy and -infected honeybees. Additionally, a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing literature were conducted to explore how nosemosis contributes to increased mortality in honeybees tested under standard conditions. The review and meta-analysis included 50 studies that reported relevant experiments involving healthy and -infected individuals. Studies lacking survivorship curves or information on potential moderators, such as spore inoculation dose, age of inoculated bees, or factors that may impact energy expenditure, were excluded. Both the experimental results and meta-analysis revealed a consistent, robust effect of infection, indicating a threefold increase in mortality among the infected group of honeybee workers (hazard ratio for infected individuals = 3.16 [1.97–5.07] and 2.99 [2.36–3.79] in the experiment and meta-analysis, respectively). However, the meta-analysis also indicated high heterogeneity in the effect magnitude, which was not explained by our moderators. Furthermore, there was a serious risk of bias within studies and potential publication bias across studies. The findings underscore knowledge gaps in the literature. It is stressed that laboratory cage trials should be viewed as an initial step in evaluating the impact of on mortality and that complementary field and apiary studies are essential for identifying effective treatments to preserve honeybee populations.
ISSN:0031-1820
1469-8161
1469-8161
DOI:10.1017/S0031182024001446