Biopsy-based Basal-luminal Subtyping Classifier in High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Combined Analysis of the NRG Oncology/RTOG 9202, 9413, and 9902 Phase 3 Trials

The Prostate Subtyping Classifier is both a prognostic and a predictive biomarker in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer undergoing radiotherapy. In addition to improving risk prediction, this classifier also allows physicians to select which patients will benefit from prolonged androg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European urology oncology 2024-11
Hauptverfasser: Patel, Krishnan R., Nguyen, Paul L., Proudfoot, James A., Liu, Yang, Pra, Alan Dal, Spratt, Daniel E., Pollack, Alan, Sandler, Howard M., Efstathiou, Jason A., Lawton, Colleen, Simko, Jeffry P., Rosenthal, Seth A., Zeitzer, Kenneth L., Mendez, Lucas C., Hartford, Alan C., Hall, William A., Desai, Anand B., Pugh, Stephanie L., Davicioni, Elai, Tran, Phuoc T., Feng, Felix Y.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Prostate Subtyping Classifier is both a prognostic and a predictive biomarker in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer undergoing radiotherapy. In addition to improving risk prediction, this classifier also allows physicians to select which patients will benefit from prolonged androgen deprivation therapy. Long-term (LT) androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been found to be beneficial to patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). However, administration of LT-ADT to all patients with high-risk PCa may lead to overtreatment. Enhanced risk stratification using genomic classifiers (such as the recently developed prostate subtyping classifier [PSC]) might be useful. This study aims to characterize the prognostic and predictive ability of the PSC in patients with high-risk PCa undergoing radiotherapy long-term (LT; 24–28 mo) versus short-term (ST; 4 mo) ADT. Biopsy samples from three randomized, phase 3 trials–NRG/RTOG 9202, 9413, and 9902–were classified as either PSC basal or luminal. The prognostic and predictive values of PSC for each oncologic endpoint (biochemical failure [BF], distant metastasis [DM], metastasis-free survival [MFS], PCa-specific mortality [PCSM], overall survival [OS]) and other cause-mortality (OCM) were assessed with Cox proportional hazards (MFS, OCM, and OS), Fine-Gray (BF, DM, and PCSM), and restricted mean survival time (RMST) models. On a multivariable analysis, the basal subtype was found to have a worse prognosis for MFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.8 [1.3–2.5], p 
ISSN:2588-9311
2588-9311
DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2024.10.017