Reactive Stroma and Acinar Morphology in Prostate Cancer: Implications for Progression and Prognostic Assessment

ABSTRACT Introduction Prostate cancer (PC) remains a significant global health concern, with prognostic assessments largely reliant on the Gleason Classification System. While it has proven effective, subjectivity in interpretation persists, prompting the need for complementary approaches. Reactive stroma (RS) has emerged as a potential candidate for enhancing PC characterization, as it reflects intricate interactions among stromal, epithelial, and extracellular matrix components. To shed light on this, we conducted a comprehensive study. Methods Two expert pathologists independently analyzed consecutive prostate biopsies (n = 120 patients), categorized into four groups based on Gleason scores. Four acinar patterns were described, denoted as A, B, C, and D. Our study uncovered a noteworthy presence of RS, predominantly within poorly differentiated tumors. Stromogenic tumors, characterized by high RS content, were particularly associated with Gleason scores of 4 + 3 and ≥ 8. Intriguingly, acinar patterns, including the distinctive B and D patterns, exhibited strong correlations with stromogenic tumors. Incorporating quantitative imaging techniques (Second Harmonic Generation and Two‐Photon Excitation Fluorescence Microscopy), we examined collagen fiber density within the stroma. Results Our analysis revealed a direct relationship between RS intensity and collagen fiber counts, particularly prominent in patterns B and D. These findings suggest that the stromal reaction in PC is closely linked to acinar morphology and collagen deposition. Moreover, rudimentary microacini at the tumor periphery, associated with intense RS and patterns B and D, may signify an unfavorable prognosis. Conclusion Our study highlights the potential of RS as an additional prognostic factor in PC. It underscores the intricate interplay between acinar patterns, RS intensity, and collagen fiber density, providing valuable insights for future prognostic assessments and therapeutic strategies. Further exploration of these relationships is essential for a comprehensive understanding of PC progression and management.