Outcomes of percutaneous versus endoscopic transmural necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis: A propensity score-matched study

Few published studies exist that compare the outcomes of different endoscopic necrosectomy methods for necrotizing pancreatitis (NP). We compared the safety and efficacy of percutaneous versus transmural endoscopic necrosectomy for NP patients. In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed adult N...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] 2024-11
Hauptverfasser: Ding, Ling, Li, Lei, Rao, Jingwen, Zhu, Yong, Xia, Liang, Liu, Pi, Luo, Lingyu, Xiong, Huifang, Hu, Yang, Wu, Yao, Ke, Huajing, Huang, Xin, Lei, Yupeng, Shu, Xu, Liu, Zhijian, Chen, Youxiang, Lu, Nonghua, Zhu, Yin, He, Wenhua
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]
container_volume
creator Ding, Ling
Li, Lei
Rao, Jingwen
Zhu, Yong
Xia, Liang
Liu, Pi
Luo, Lingyu
Xiong, Huifang
Hu, Yang
Wu, Yao
Ke, Huajing
Huang, Xin
Lei, Yupeng
Shu, Xu
Liu, Zhijian
Chen, Youxiang
Lu, Nonghua
Zhu, Yin
He, Wenhua
description Few published studies exist that compare the outcomes of different endoscopic necrosectomy methods for necrotizing pancreatitis (NP). We compared the safety and efficacy of percutaneous versus transmural endoscopic necrosectomy for NP patients. In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed adult NP patients who underwent either percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy (PEN) or endoscopic transmural necrosectomy (ETN), and compared safety and efficacy between the two groups. Propensity score-matched analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis were conducted. A total of 280 patients were enrolled, among which 142 underwent PEN and 138 underwent ETN. There were differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups, including body mass index, C-reactive protein, systemic inflammatory response syndrome score. The incidences of sepsis, respiratory failure, and intensive care unit stay were higher among patients who underwent PEN than those who underwent ETN (all P  0.05). Multivariate analysis also showed that the approaches (PEN vs ETN) was not associated with postoperative complications or mortality. In real world setting, sicker patients tend to be more effectively managed through PEN compared to ETN. PEN demonstrates comparable efficacy and safety to ETN in the treatment of NP patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pan.2024.11.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3128746571</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1424390324007890</els_id><sourcerecordid>3128746571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1500-ef1e2f0cbb623e4778a2f2f272ebe8dfdd5dd06567757332dc1c7ffbb0f4b8363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFP3DAQha2qqFDaH8AF-dhLgsdO4l04oRW0SEh7gbPl2OPWq02c2g7S9sY_r1ehHKs5zGj05mneR8gFsBoYdFe7etJjzRlvaoCaseYDOYOGN5VYA3x8n5k4JZ9T2jHGOcD6EzkV65aD5OyMvG7nbMKAiQZHJ4xmznrEMCf6gjGVhqMNyYTJG5qjHtMwR72nI5oYEpochgN1IS6L7P_48SctT5mIOvvs0zW9pVMME47J5wMtThGrQWfzCy1NebaHL-TE6X3Cr2_9nDzf3z1tflSP2-8Pm9vHykDLWIUOkDtm-r7jAhspV5q7UpJjjyvrrG2tZV3bSdlKIbg1YKRzfc9c069EJ87Jt8W3vPN7xpTV4JPB_X7JqwTwlWy6VkKRwiI9hkwRnZqiH3Q8KGDqSF7tVAmpjuQVgCrky83lm_3cD2jfL_6hLoKbRYAl5IvHqJLxOBq0PhaQygb_H_u_fVWYYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3128746571</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcomes of percutaneous versus endoscopic transmural necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis: A propensity score-matched study</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ding, Ling ; Li, Lei ; Rao, Jingwen ; Zhu, Yong ; Xia, Liang ; Liu, Pi ; Luo, Lingyu ; Xiong, Huifang ; Hu, Yang ; Wu, Yao ; Ke, Huajing ; Huang, Xin ; Lei, Yupeng ; Shu, Xu ; Liu, Zhijian ; Chen, Youxiang ; Lu, Nonghua ; Zhu, Yin ; He, Wenhua</creator><creatorcontrib>Ding, Ling ; Li, Lei ; Rao, Jingwen ; Zhu, Yong ; Xia, Liang ; Liu, Pi ; Luo, Lingyu ; Xiong, Huifang ; Hu, Yang ; Wu, Yao ; Ke, Huajing ; Huang, Xin ; Lei, Yupeng ; Shu, Xu ; Liu, Zhijian ; Chen, Youxiang ; Lu, Nonghua ; Zhu, Yin ; He, Wenhua</creatorcontrib><description>Few published studies exist that compare the outcomes of different endoscopic necrosectomy methods for necrotizing pancreatitis (NP). We compared the safety and efficacy of percutaneous versus transmural endoscopic necrosectomy for NP patients. In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed adult NP patients who underwent either percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy (PEN) or endoscopic transmural necrosectomy (ETN), and compared safety and efficacy between the two groups. Propensity score-matched analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis were conducted. A total of 280 patients were enrolled, among which 142 underwent PEN and 138 underwent ETN. There were differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups, including body mass index, C-reactive protein, systemic inflammatory response syndrome score. The incidences of sepsis, respiratory failure, and intensive care unit stay were higher among patients who underwent PEN than those who underwent ETN (all P &lt; 0.01). Ninety-one pairs were matched with comparable baseline characteristics and severity. The incidence of postoperative complications, open surgery, clinical success, radiological success, collection recurrence, and reintervention were not significantly different between the ETN group and PEN group (all P &gt; 0.05). Multivariate analysis also showed that the approaches (PEN vs ETN) was not associated with postoperative complications or mortality. In real world setting, sicker patients tend to be more effectively managed through PEN compared to ETN. PEN demonstrates comparable efficacy and safety to ETN in the treatment of NP patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1424-3903</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1424-3911</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1424-3911</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2024.11.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39521720</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acute pancreatitis ; Endoscopic transmural necrosectomy ; Necrotizing pancreatitis ; Percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy</subject><ispartof>Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.], 2024-11</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1500-ef1e2f0cbb623e4778a2f2f272ebe8dfdd5dd06567757332dc1c7ffbb0f4b8363</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5499-1346</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39521720$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ding, Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Jingwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Pi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Lingyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Huifang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ke, Huajing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Yupeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shu, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhijian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Youxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Nonghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Yin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Wenhua</creatorcontrib><title>Outcomes of percutaneous versus endoscopic transmural necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis: A propensity score-matched study</title><title>Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]</title><addtitle>Pancreatology</addtitle><description>Few published studies exist that compare the outcomes of different endoscopic necrosectomy methods for necrotizing pancreatitis (NP). We compared the safety and efficacy of percutaneous versus transmural endoscopic necrosectomy for NP patients. In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed adult NP patients who underwent either percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy (PEN) or endoscopic transmural necrosectomy (ETN), and compared safety and efficacy between the two groups. Propensity score-matched analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis were conducted. A total of 280 patients were enrolled, among which 142 underwent PEN and 138 underwent ETN. There were differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups, including body mass index, C-reactive protein, systemic inflammatory response syndrome score. The incidences of sepsis, respiratory failure, and intensive care unit stay were higher among patients who underwent PEN than those who underwent ETN (all P &lt; 0.01). Ninety-one pairs were matched with comparable baseline characteristics and severity. The incidence of postoperative complications, open surgery, clinical success, radiological success, collection recurrence, and reintervention were not significantly different between the ETN group and PEN group (all P &gt; 0.05). Multivariate analysis also showed that the approaches (PEN vs ETN) was not associated with postoperative complications or mortality. In real world setting, sicker patients tend to be more effectively managed through PEN compared to ETN. PEN demonstrates comparable efficacy and safety to ETN in the treatment of NP patients.</description><subject>Acute pancreatitis</subject><subject>Endoscopic transmural necrosectomy</subject><subject>Necrotizing pancreatitis</subject><subject>Percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy</subject><issn>1424-3903</issn><issn>1424-3911</issn><issn>1424-3911</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFP3DAQha2qqFDaH8AF-dhLgsdO4l04oRW0SEh7gbPl2OPWq02c2g7S9sY_r1ehHKs5zGj05mneR8gFsBoYdFe7etJjzRlvaoCaseYDOYOGN5VYA3x8n5k4JZ9T2jHGOcD6EzkV65aD5OyMvG7nbMKAiQZHJ4xmznrEMCf6gjGVhqMNyYTJG5qjHtMwR72nI5oYEpochgN1IS6L7P_48SctT5mIOvvs0zW9pVMME47J5wMtThGrQWfzCy1NebaHL-TE6X3Cr2_9nDzf3z1tflSP2-8Pm9vHykDLWIUOkDtm-r7jAhspV5q7UpJjjyvrrG2tZV3bSdlKIbg1YKRzfc9c069EJ87Jt8W3vPN7xpTV4JPB_X7JqwTwlWy6VkKRwiI9hkwRnZqiH3Q8KGDqSF7tVAmpjuQVgCrky83lm_3cD2jfL_6hLoKbRYAl5IvHqJLxOBq0PhaQygb_H_u_fVWYYw</recordid><startdate>20241103</startdate><enddate>20241103</enddate><creator>Ding, Ling</creator><creator>Li, Lei</creator><creator>Rao, Jingwen</creator><creator>Zhu, Yong</creator><creator>Xia, Liang</creator><creator>Liu, Pi</creator><creator>Luo, Lingyu</creator><creator>Xiong, Huifang</creator><creator>Hu, Yang</creator><creator>Wu, Yao</creator><creator>Ke, Huajing</creator><creator>Huang, Xin</creator><creator>Lei, Yupeng</creator><creator>Shu, Xu</creator><creator>Liu, Zhijian</creator><creator>Chen, Youxiang</creator><creator>Lu, Nonghua</creator><creator>Zhu, Yin</creator><creator>He, Wenhua</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5499-1346</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241103</creationdate><title>Outcomes of percutaneous versus endoscopic transmural necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis: A propensity score-matched study</title><author>Ding, Ling ; Li, Lei ; Rao, Jingwen ; Zhu, Yong ; Xia, Liang ; Liu, Pi ; Luo, Lingyu ; Xiong, Huifang ; Hu, Yang ; Wu, Yao ; Ke, Huajing ; Huang, Xin ; Lei, Yupeng ; Shu, Xu ; Liu, Zhijian ; Chen, Youxiang ; Lu, Nonghua ; Zhu, Yin ; He, Wenhua</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1500-ef1e2f0cbb623e4778a2f2f272ebe8dfdd5dd06567757332dc1c7ffbb0f4b8363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Acute pancreatitis</topic><topic>Endoscopic transmural necrosectomy</topic><topic>Necrotizing pancreatitis</topic><topic>Percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ding, Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Jingwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Pi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Lingyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Huifang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ke, Huajing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Yupeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shu, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhijian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Youxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Nonghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Yin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Wenhua</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ding, Ling</au><au>Li, Lei</au><au>Rao, Jingwen</au><au>Zhu, Yong</au><au>Xia, Liang</au><au>Liu, Pi</au><au>Luo, Lingyu</au><au>Xiong, Huifang</au><au>Hu, Yang</au><au>Wu, Yao</au><au>Ke, Huajing</au><au>Huang, Xin</au><au>Lei, Yupeng</au><au>Shu, Xu</au><au>Liu, Zhijian</au><au>Chen, Youxiang</au><au>Lu, Nonghua</au><au>Zhu, Yin</au><au>He, Wenhua</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcomes of percutaneous versus endoscopic transmural necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis: A propensity score-matched study</atitle><jtitle>Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]</jtitle><addtitle>Pancreatology</addtitle><date>2024-11-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>1424-3903</issn><issn>1424-3911</issn><eissn>1424-3911</eissn><abstract>Few published studies exist that compare the outcomes of different endoscopic necrosectomy methods for necrotizing pancreatitis (NP). We compared the safety and efficacy of percutaneous versus transmural endoscopic necrosectomy for NP patients. In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed adult NP patients who underwent either percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy (PEN) or endoscopic transmural necrosectomy (ETN), and compared safety and efficacy between the two groups. Propensity score-matched analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis were conducted. A total of 280 patients were enrolled, among which 142 underwent PEN and 138 underwent ETN. There were differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups, including body mass index, C-reactive protein, systemic inflammatory response syndrome score. The incidences of sepsis, respiratory failure, and intensive care unit stay were higher among patients who underwent PEN than those who underwent ETN (all P &lt; 0.01). Ninety-one pairs were matched with comparable baseline characteristics and severity. The incidence of postoperative complications, open surgery, clinical success, radiological success, collection recurrence, and reintervention were not significantly different between the ETN group and PEN group (all P &gt; 0.05). Multivariate analysis also showed that the approaches (PEN vs ETN) was not associated with postoperative complications or mortality. In real world setting, sicker patients tend to be more effectively managed through PEN compared to ETN. PEN demonstrates comparable efficacy and safety to ETN in the treatment of NP patients.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>39521720</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pan.2024.11.004</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5499-1346</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1424-3903
ispartof Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.], 2024-11
issn 1424-3903
1424-3911
1424-3911
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3128746571
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acute pancreatitis
Endoscopic transmural necrosectomy
Necrotizing pancreatitis
Percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy
title Outcomes of percutaneous versus endoscopic transmural necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis: A propensity score-matched study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T17%3A28%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes%20of%20percutaneous%20versus%20endoscopic%20transmural%20necrosectomy%20for%20necrotizing%20pancreatitis:%20A%20propensity%20score-matched%20study&rft.jtitle=Pancreatology%20:%20official%20journal%20of%20the%20International%20Association%20of%20Pancreatology%20(IAP)%20...%20%5Bet%20al.%5D&rft.au=Ding,%20Ling&rft.date=2024-11-03&rft.issn=1424-3903&rft.eissn=1424-3911&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pan.2024.11.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3128746571%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3128746571&rft_id=info:pmid/39521720&rft_els_id=S1424390324007890&rfr_iscdi=true