Outcomes of percutaneous versus endoscopic transmural necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis: A propensity score-matched study

Few published studies exist that compare the outcomes of different endoscopic necrosectomy methods for necrotizing pancreatitis (NP). We compared the safety and efficacy of percutaneous versus transmural endoscopic necrosectomy for NP patients. In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed adult NP patients who underwent either percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy (PEN) or endoscopic transmural necrosectomy (ETN), and compared safety and efficacy between the two groups. Propensity score-matched analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis were conducted. A total of 280 patients were enrolled, among which 142 underwent PEN and 138 underwent ETN. There were differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups, including body mass index, C-reactive protein, systemic inflammatory response syndrome score. The incidences of sepsis, respiratory failure, and intensive care unit stay were higher among patients who underwent PEN than those who underwent ETN (all P 0.05). Multivariate analysis also showed that the approaches (PEN vs ETN) was not associated with postoperative complications or mortality. In real world setting, sicker patients tend to be more effectively managed through PEN compared to ETN. PEN demonstrates comparable efficacy and safety to ETN in the treatment of NP patients.