Comparison of immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy or ipilimumab plus nivolumab-based therapy for NSCLC patients with PD-L1 TPS (1–49 %): TOPGAN2023-01

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy is now a standard treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether ICI plus chemotherapy (ICI-chemo) or ipilimumab plus nivolumab (I-N)-based therapy is superior for patients with NSCLC with a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor prop...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cancer (1990) 2024-12, Vol.213, p.115117, Article 115117
Hauptverfasser: Tanaka, Hisashi, Makiguchi, Tomonori, Tozuka, Takehiro, Kawashima, Yosuke, Oba, Tomohiro, Tsugitomi, Ryosuke, Koyama, Junji, Tambo, Yuichi, Ogusu, Shinsuke, Saiki, Masafumi, Gyotoku, Hiroshi, Hasegawa, Tsukasa, Miyauchi, Eisaku, Sonoda, Tomoaki, Saito, Ryota, Nakatomi, Katsumi, Sakatani, Toshio, Kudo, Keita, Tsuchiya-Kawano, Yuko, Nishio, Makoto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy is now a standard treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether ICI plus chemotherapy (ICI-chemo) or ipilimumab plus nivolumab (I-N)-based therapy is superior for patients with NSCLC with a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) of 1–49 % has not been evaluated. This multicenter retrospective study included NSCLC patients with a TPS score of 1–49 %, who began first-line chemotherapy. Propensity score matching analysis was used to adjust for various confounders and evaluate treatment efficacy. A total of 401 patients were enrolled, of whom 308 received ICI-chemo and 93 received I-N-based therapy. The median OS was 21.0 months in the ICI-chemo group and 20.0 months in the I-N-based therapy group. After propensity score matching, there was no difference in OS or PFS between the ICI-chemo group and the I-N-based therapy group (OS: hazard ratios (HR), 0.83; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.54–1.26, PFS: HR, 0.72; 95 % CI, 0.52–1.00). Among PD-L1 TPS 25–49 %, there was a tendency for OS to be favorable for the ICI-chemo group (OS: HR, 0.30; 95 % CI, 0.09–0.85). Treatment discontinuation occurred for 26.2 % of the patients in the ICI-chemo group and 41.9 % in the I-N-based therapy group. Among PD-L1 TPS 1–49 %, there was no significant difference in survival outcomes between the ICI-chemo group and the I-N-based therapy group. Based on the results of a subgroup analysis, ICI-chemo may be superior for treating NSCLC with a TPS of 25–49 %. •The appropriate regimen for NSCLC with a TPS of 1–49 % is unclear.•Among TPS 1–49 %, the survival outcomes appear similar between both groups.•The toxicity discontinuation rate was higher in the I-N-based therapy group.•ICI-chemo may be superior for treating NSCLC with a TPS of 25–49 %.
ISSN:0959-8049
1879-0852
1879-0852
DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115117