Evaluating Seismocardiography as a Non-Exercise Method for Estimating Maximal Oxygen Uptake
The value of maximal oxygen uptake (VO ) is a key health indicator. Usually, VO is determined with cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), which is cumbersome and time-consuming, making it impractical in many testing scenarios. The aim of this study is to validate a novel seismocardiography sensor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Healthcare (Basel) 2024-11, Vol.12 (21), p.2162 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The value of maximal oxygen uptake (VO
) is a key health indicator. Usually, VO
is determined with cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), which is cumbersome and time-consuming, making it impractical in many testing scenarios. The aim of this study is to validate a novel seismocardiography sensor (Seismofit
, VentriJect DK, Hellerup, Denmark) for non-exercise estimation of VO
.
A cohort of 94 healthy subjects (52% females, 48.2 (8.7) years old) were included in this study. All subjects performed an ergometer CPET. Seismofit
measurements were obtained 10 and 5 min before CPET in resting condition and 5 min after exhaustion.
The CPET VO
was 37.2 (8.6) mL/min/kg, which was not different from the two first Seismofit
estimates at 37.5 (8.1) mL/min/kg (
= 0.28) and 37.3 (7.8) mL/min/kg (
= 0.66). Post-exercise Seismofit
was 33.8 (7.1) mL/min/kg (
< 0.001). The correlation between the CPET and the Seismofit
was r = 0.834 and r = 0.832 for the two first estimates, and the mean average percentage error was 11.4% and 11.2%. Intraclass correlation coefficients between the first and second Seismofit
measurement was 0.993, indicating excellent test-retest reliability.
The novel Seismofit
VO
estimate correlates well with CPET VO
, and the accuracy is acceptable for general health assessment. The repeatability of Seismofit
estimates obtained at rest was very high. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2227-9032 2227-9032 |
DOI: | 10.3390/healthcare12212162 |