Bridging perspectives - A review and synthesis of 53 theoretical models of delusions

The degree to which numerous existing models of delusion formation disagree or propose common mechanisms remains unclear. To achieve a comprehensive understanding of delusion aetiology, we summarised 53 theoretical models of delusions extracted from a systematic literature search. We identified cent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical psychology review 2024-12, Vol.114, p.102510, Article 102510
Hauptverfasser: Denecke, S., Schönig, S.N., Bott, A., Faße, J.L., Lincoln, T.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The degree to which numerous existing models of delusion formation disagree or propose common mechanisms remains unclear. To achieve a comprehensive understanding of delusion aetiology, we summarised 53 theoretical models of delusions extracted from a systematic literature search. We identified central aspects and unique or overarching features of five core perspectives: cognitive (n = 22), associative learning (n = 4), social (n = 6), neurobiological (n = 6), and Bayesian inference (n = 15). These perspectives differ in foci and mechanistic explanations. Whereas some postulate delusions to result from associative and operant learning, others assume a disbalance in the integration of prior beliefs and sensory input or emphasise the relevance of information processing biases. Postulated moderators range from maladaptive generalised beliefs over neurocognitive impairment to dopamine, stress, and affective dysregulation. The models also differ in whether they attempt to explain delusion formation in general or the delusional content (i.e., persecutory). Finally, some models postulate functional aspects of delusions, such as insight relief. Despite their differences, the perspectives converge on the idea that delusions form as an explanation for an experienced ambiguity. Building on this common ground, we propose an integrative framework incorporating essential mechanistic explanations from each perspective and discuss its implications for research and clinical practice. •53 models cover cognitive, associative learning, social, neurobiological, and Bayesian inference perspectives on delusions.•Some models suggest delusions result from associative and operant learning, dopamine disbalance, or the social context.•Others emphasise specific information processing biases or a disbalanced integration of sensory input and prior beliefs.•Models from all perspectives suggest that delusions are formed to explain an experienced ambiguity.•We propose an integrative framework that combines the essences of the five perspectives on delusions.
ISSN:0272-7358
1873-7811
1873-7811
DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102510