Different approach to M descriptor for future staging of oligometastatic disease in SCLC: A cross-sectional survival analysis

This study aimed to investigate the impact of oligometastasis and the M descriptor on survival in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This multicenter, retrospective study included patients with newly diagnosed extensive-stage SCLC(ES-SCLC) from 2010 to 2020. Subgroups: Group 1: single metastasis in a si...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical & translational oncology 2024-11
Hauptverfasser: Uzel Şener, Melahat, Akın Kabalak, Pınar, Kavurgacı, Suna, Yılmaz Demirci, Nilgün, Kızılgöz, Derya, Yanık, Fazlı, Ermin, Sinem, Söyler, Yasemin, Karamustafaoğlu, Yekta Altemur, Türkay Pakna, Demet, Dumanlı, Ahmet, Yılmaz, Ülkü
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aimed to investigate the impact of oligometastasis and the M descriptor on survival in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This multicenter, retrospective study included patients with newly diagnosed extensive-stage SCLC(ES-SCLC) from 2010 to 2020. Subgroups: Group 1: single metastasis in a single organ, Group 2: 2-5 metastases in a single organ, Group 3: 6 or more metastases in a single organ, and Group 4: metastases in two or more organs. This classification was based on the 9th Staging-M descriptor. Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses were conducted. The mean age of the 439 patients was 62 ± 10 years, and 89.5% of them were male. The mean PFS for Groups 1, 2, 3, 4 was 10.7 months (95% CI 8.9-12.5), 7.5 months (95% CI 5.6-9.4), 4.3 months (95% CI 2.9-5.7), and 5.4 months (95% CI 4.7-6.1), respectively. PFS in Group 2 was significantly higher. The mean OS for Groups 1, 2, 3, 4 was 13.3 months (95% CI 11.2-15.3), 9.5 months (95% CI 7.1-11.9), 7.1 months (95% CI 4.5-9.7), and 6.9 months (95% CI 6.0-7.9), respectively. OS in Group 1 was significantly higher. OS and PFS in the M1b group were significantly higher than in the M1c1 and M1c2 groups (p 
ISSN:1699-3055
1699-3055
DOI:10.1007/s12094-024-03778-w