Prehospital Reverse Shock Index Times Glasgow Coma Scale as a Predictor for Trauma Intervention in Paediatric Trauma Patients
Previous studies have identified the reverse shock index x Glasgow Coma Scale (rSIG) as a tool for predicting the need for trauma intervention in pediatric patients. This study sought to investigate the utility of prehospital rSIG as a triage tool to predict the need for trauma-center level of care...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pediatric surgery 2024-10, p.162018, Article 162018 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Previous studies have identified the reverse shock index x Glasgow Coma Scale (rSIG) as a tool for predicting the need for trauma intervention in pediatric patients. This study sought to investigate the utility of prehospital rSIG as a triage tool to predict the need for trauma-center level of care in a large pediatric cohort.
Data from the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) (2018–2020) were used. Patients aged 1–18 with valid values for prehospital systolic blood pressure (EMS SBP), prehospital heart rate (EMS HR), and EMS total GCS, were included. Prehospital rSIG was calculated as (EMS SBP/EMS HR) x EMS total GCS. Abnormal values for rSIG were defined as: ≤13.1, ≤16.5, and ≤20.1 for patients aged 1–6, 7–12, and 13–18, respectively. Injury severity was determined by Injury Severity Score (ISS). ISS 1–8 represented minor injury, 9–15 moderate injury, and 16 severe injury. Rates of hemorrhage control surgery, embolization, transfusion at 4 hours, mechanical ventilation, ICU stay 3 days, and mortality was compared between patients with abnormal vs. normal prehospital rSIG.
120,941 patients were included in the analysis; 60269 (49.8 %) had an abnormal prehospital rSIG. Patients with abnormal prehospital rSIG had significantly higher rates of 1 trauma intervention (23.3 % vs 8.3 %, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3468 1531-5037 1531-5037 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162018 |