Differences in metabolic syndrome severity and prevalence across nine waist circumference measurements collected from smartphone digital anthropometrics

Given the technological advances in 3D smartphone (SP) anthropometry, this technique presents a unique opportunity to improve metabolic syndrome (MetS) screening through optimal waist circumference (WC) landmarking procedures. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the associations between...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical nutrition ESPEN 2024-12, Vol.64, p.390-399
Hauptverfasser: Graybeal, Austin J., Brandner, Caleb F., Compton, Abby T., Swafford, Sydney H., Aultman, Ryan S., Vallecillo-Bustos, Anabelle, Stavres, Jon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Given the technological advances in 3D smartphone (SP) anthropometry, this technique presents a unique opportunity to improve metabolic syndrome (MetS) screening through optimal waist circumference (WC) landmarking procedures. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the associations between individual MetS risk factors and nine independent WC sites collected using tape measurement or SP anthropometrics and to determine the differences in MetS severity and prevalence when using these different WC measurement locations. A total of 130 participants (F:74, M:56; age: 27.8 ± 11.1) completed this cross-sectional evaluation. Using traditional tape measurement, WC was measured at the lowest rib (WCRib), superior iliac crest (WCIliac), and between the WCRib and WCIliac (WCMid). Additionally, WC measurements were automated using a SP application at six sites along the torso. MetS risk factors were used to calculate MetS severity (MetSindex) and prevalence. Associations were evaluated using multiple linear regression, the effect of each WC site on MetSindex was analyzed using mixed-models ANCOVA, and differences in MetS prevalence using WCIliac as the current standard were determined using sensitivity, specificity, chi-squared tests, and odds ratios. The reference SP-WC (SPRef) and WCRib demonstrated the largest associations (all p 
ISSN:2405-4577
2405-4577
DOI:10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.10.158