Disease recurrence in patients undergoing mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ

With DCIS incidence on the rise, up to 30% of patients undergo mastectomy for Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (Nash and Hwang, in: Ann Surg Oncol 30(6):3206-3214, 2023). Local recurrence rates after mastectomy for DCIS are reportedly low, but risk factors for recurrence are not known (Kim et al., in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Breast cancer research and treatment 2024-11
Hauptverfasser: Kuo, Marissa C, Sims, Jessica, Solis, Odette K, Meszoely, Ingrid M, Sweeting, Raeshell S, Grau, Ana M, Hewitt, Kelly C, Kauffmann, Rondi M, Kelley, Mark C, McCaffrey, Rachel L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:With DCIS incidence on the rise, up to 30% of patients undergo mastectomy for Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (Nash and Hwang, in: Ann Surg Oncol 30(6):3206-3214, 2023). Local recurrence rates after mastectomy for DCIS are reportedly low, but risk factors for recurrence are not known (Kim et al., in: J Cancer Res Ther 16(6):1197-1202, 2020). We aim to define risk factors associated with ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence in patients undergoing mastectomy for DCIS. We aimed to identify risk factors that may contribute to recurrence of breast cancer following mastectomy for pure DCIS. We hypothesized that close or positive mastectomy margins, age at diagnosis, extent of breast disease and mutation carriers would be associated with increased risk of recurrence. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral mastectomies for pure DCIS at a single academic tertiary referral center from 2013 to 2023. There were 165 patients who met inclusion criteria with an average length of follow-up of 39.9 months. On final surgical pathology, the average span of DCIS was 33.7 mm (± 24.6 mm). Hormone receptor positive disease was identified in 80.6% of the patient cohort. For margin status, 23 patients (14%) had 
ISSN:0167-6806
1573-7217
1573-7217
DOI:10.1007/s10549-024-07530-4